From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-289856-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4464 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2011 21:23:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 4456 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2011 21:23:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:23:44 +0000
Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so5210692wye.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.169.140 with SMTP id z12mr5561083wby.89.1303161823399; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.0.140 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DAC8AD5.8080803@codesourcery.com>
References: <20110418184702.GN5273@kam.mff.cuni.cz>	<4DAC8AD5.8080803@codesourcery.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimj4iL4spSFb26h-nX1RaxdNBYmAA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [c++] Remove redundant inline check
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01460.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrot=
e:
> On 4/18/2011 11:47 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
>> Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
>>
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 * cp/semantics.c (finish_goto_stmt): Do set UNINLINABLE flag=
 on computed
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 gotos.
>
> Provided that we have this check elsewhere in the compiler and are
> therefore confident we won't accidentally inline such things, this is fin=
e.

Though the description in the changelog sounds backwards (missing a 'not'?)

Richard.

> --
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery
> mark@codesourcery.com
> (650) 331-3385=A0x713
>