From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-291640-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8786 invoked by alias); 11 May 2011 08:35:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 8665 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2011 08:35:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 08:35:25 +0000
Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so231657wye.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.196.198 with SMTP id eh6mr5100162wbb.55.1305102924524; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.20.74 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 01:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikZeu3-G9Ghozub9ZFN5_pZg+Ka4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1299817406-16745-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>	<1299817406-16745-13-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>	<AANLkTi=uH5vRtQUHBgTAsk8HpD8DwRUeUsz-wiNn7PPK@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTikZeu3-G9Ghozub9ZFN5_pZg+Ka4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 09:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimk36GJNMk+S7Sc15DrRbg34FzzDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] make CASE_LABEL_EXPR not abuse TREE_CHAIN
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00811.txt.bz2

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:19, Richard Guenther
> <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:23 AM, Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>=
 wrote:
>>> Move CASE_CHAIN into a local operand for CASE_LABEL_EXPR. =A0Nothing to
>>> see here.
>>
>> I wonder if there isn't a better way to do this ... like always requiring
>> operand 2 of SWITCH_EXPRs.
>
> Could be, but I think it makes sense to do it in incremental steps.
> This change seems like a step forward in its own sense. =A0I'm fine with
> it.

Yeah, ok.

Richard.

>
> Diego.
>