From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7218 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2011 16:23:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 7203 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2011 16:23:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:23:21 +0000 Received: by vws2 with SMTP id 2so656644vws.20 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:23:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.113.168 with SMTP id iz8mr982061vdb.35.1303489400173; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.113.168 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:23:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DB0679C.9050100@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: new option -Wno-maybe-uninitialized From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Richard Guenther Cc: Xinliang David Li , Jeff Law , GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01877.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> Maybe-uninitialized matches case 3) -- different from case 2 which is >> actually 'maybe-used-uninitialized'. > > Other diagnostics use a level to indicate their noise level. =A0So, why n= ot > do something like -Wuninitialized=3DN, with N from 1 to 3, covering all > three cases. because numbers are good for machines, but terrible as user-interface :-)