From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18539 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2011 09:10:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 18529 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2011 09:10:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:09:50 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2156138ewy.20 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:09:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.19.205 with SMTP id c13mr288814ebb.72.1308042588785; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.27.203 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 02:09:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, SMS] Fix violation of memory dependence From: Revital Eres To: Ayal Zaks Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01017.txt.bz2 Hello, >> You could check first thing if (from->cuid == to->cuid), for code clarity. > > I will address this point separately and commit the current version of > the patch as is if that's OK. Re-thinking about that, I'll prepare a new version of the patch which addresses this and re-send it. Sorry for the confusion, Revital