From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19850 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2011 21:56:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 19834 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2011 21:56:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 21:56:20 +0000 Received: by qwh5 with SMTP id 5so1263366qwh.20 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:56:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.175.211 with SMTP id bb19mr1888275qab.95.1308866179534; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.47.134 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:56:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E03B1D1.8090604@codesourcery.com> References: <4E03B1D1.8090604@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [testsuite] ARM ivopts tests: skip for no thumb support From: Ramana Radhakrishnan To: Janis Johnson Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , tom@codesourcery.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01830.txt.bz2 On 23 June 2011 22:36, Janis Johnson wrote: > Tests gcc.target/arm/ivopts*.c add -mthumb but fail on targets without > thumb support; skip those targets. =A0The tests save temporary files and > need to remove them at the end, easily done with cleanup-saved-temps. > > Test ivopts-6.c is the only one of the set that does not require thumb2 > support in the check for object-size, and it fails for -march=3Diwmmxt > and iwmmxt2; the check should probably be used on that test as well, > although I haven't included it here. I'm not sure I understand the change for ivopts-6.c : It's skipping if there is no Thumb support by default but the test assumes the test will run with -marm on the command line ? Ramana