From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6942 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2011 20:16:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 6934 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2011 20:16:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ew0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-ew0-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:16:25 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so2282638ewy.20 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.27.14 with SMTP id g14mr3095443ebc.63.1302639383824; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.10.20 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DA4A506.2080907@codesourcery.com> References: <4D9F24B2.5040001@codesourcery.com> <35462F6B-37E7-40B7-A519-B975BC04B0EB@comcast.net> <4DA4A506.2080907@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [testsuite] fix to gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c From: Ramana Radhakrishnan To: Janis Johnson Cc: Mike Stump , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00933.txt.bz2 On 12 April 2011 20:16, Janis Johnson wrote: > On 04/08/2011 04:37 PM, Mike Stump wrote: >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 8:07 AM, Janis Johnson wrote: >>> Test gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c specifies -march=3Darmv7-a and fails >>> execution for multilibs whose hardware or simulator doesn't support that >>> architecture. >> >> Ideally, I'd like target people to weigh in on target changes, ssa peopl= e to weigh in on ssa testcases and so on... =A0If they don't approve or rej= ect it soon, I'll weigh in... =A0I don't see any reason not to approve it. > > Ramana, is this change OK? =A0Please look also at a patch for gcc.target/= arm/sync-1.c that I submitted right after this one. This is OK. cheers Ramana