public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [4.6 PATCH] Workaround for stack slot sharing problems with unrolling (PR fortran/49103)
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 10:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinrmv=rJDuh8T0sKtpO=eMEpiqNdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110607063150.GY17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While for the trunk I hope Michael will finalize a much better fix,
> this patch provides a quick workaround for 4.6 branch.
>
> In particular, I'd like to avoid reverting the
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01442.html
> patch, because if GIMPLE passes don't do any significant code motion,
> sharing the stack slots e.g. for Fortran I/O parameter block helps quite a
> bit.  So, what this patch attempts to do is (only for the cases which
> changed by the above mentioned patch) make the stack slot sharing
> conditional on no significant code motion (loop {,complete} unrolling and other
> kind of bb duplication).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for 4.6 branch?
> Or is it way too ugly and should I rather revert there my patch?

Ugh ...

> 2011-06-07  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>        PR fortran/49103
>        * tree.h (DECL_NONSHAREABLE): Define.
>        (struct tree_decl_common): Change decl_common_unused to
>        decl_nonshareable_flag.
>        * cfgexpand.c (expand_used_vars_for_block, clear_tree_used):
>        Ignore vars with DECL_NONSHAREABLE bit set.
>        * tree-cfg.c (gimple_duplicate_bb): Set DECL_NONSHAREABLE
>        on stores to automatic aggregate vars.
>
>        * gfortran.dg/pr49103.f90: New test.
>
> --- gcc/tree.h.jj       2011-03-14 14:12:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree.h  2011-05-31 14:05:34.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1330,6 +1330,10 @@ extern void omp_clause_range_check_faile
>  #define DECL_READ_P(NODE) \
>   (TREE_CHECK2 (NODE, VAR_DECL, PARM_DECL)->decl_common.decl_read_flag)
>
> +#define DECL_NONSHAREABLE(NODE) \
> +  (TREE_CHECK2 (NODE, VAR_DECL, \
> +               RESULT_DECL)->decl_common.decl_nonshareable_flag)
> +
>  /* In a CALL_EXPR, means that the call is the jump from a thunk to the
>    thunked-to function.  */
>  #define CALL_FROM_THUNK_P(NODE) (CALL_EXPR_CHECK (NODE)->base.protected_flag)
> @@ -2787,8 +2791,9 @@ struct GTY(()) tree_decl_common {
>      being set.  */
>   unsigned decl_read_flag : 1;
>
> -  /* Padding so that 'off_align' can be on a 32-bit boundary.  */
> -  unsigned decl_common_unused : 1;
> +  /* In VAR_DECL or RESULT_DECL set when significant code movement precludes
> +     attempting to share the stack slot with some other variable.  */
> +  unsigned decl_nonshareable_flag : 1;
>
>   /* DECL_OFFSET_ALIGN, used only for FIELD_DECLs.  */
>   unsigned int off_align : 8;
> --- gcc/cfgexpand.c.jj  2011-05-04 10:46:52.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/cfgexpand.c     2011-05-31 14:08:36.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1134,7 +1134,9 @@ expand_used_vars_for_block (tree block,
>
>   /* Expand all variables at this level.  */
>   for (t = BLOCK_VARS (block); t ; t = DECL_CHAIN (t))
> -    if (TREE_USED (t))
> +    if (TREE_USED (t)
> +        && ((TREE_CODE (t) != VAR_DECL && TREE_CODE (t) != RESULT_DECL)
> +           || !DECL_NONSHAREABLE (t)))
>       expand_one_var (t, toplevel, true);
>
>   this_sv_num = stack_vars_num;
> @@ -1167,6 +1169,8 @@ clear_tree_used (tree block)
>
>   for (t = BLOCK_VARS (block); t ; t = DECL_CHAIN (t))
>     /* if (!TREE_STATIC (t) && !DECL_EXTERNAL (t)) */
> +    if ((TREE_CODE (t) != VAR_DECL && TREE_CODE (t) != RESULT_DECL)
> +       || !DECL_NONSHAREABLE (t))
>       TREE_USED (t) = 0;
>
>   for (t = BLOCK_SUBBLOCKS (block); t ; t = BLOCK_CHAIN (t))
> --- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj   2011-03-14 14:12:15.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/tree-cfg.c      2011-05-31 15:22:14.000000000 +0200
> @@ -5117,6 +5117,7 @@ gimple_duplicate_bb (basic_block bb)
>     {
>       def_operand_p def_p;
>       ssa_op_iter op_iter;
> +      tree lhs;
>
>       stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
>       if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_LABEL)
> @@ -5130,6 +5131,29 @@ gimple_duplicate_bb (basic_block bb)
>       maybe_duplicate_eh_stmt (copy, stmt);
>       gimple_duplicate_stmt_histograms (cfun, copy, cfun, stmt);
>
> +      /* When copying around a stmt writing into a local non-user
> +        aggregate, make sure it won't share stack slot with other
> +        vars.  */
> +      lhs = gimple_get_lhs (stmt);
> +      if (lhs
> +         && (handled_component_p (lhs)
> +             || TREE_CODE (lhs) == MEM_REF
> +             || TREE_CODE (lhs) == TARGET_MEM_REF
> +             || TREE_CODE (lhs) == VAR_DECL
> +             || TREE_CODE (lhs) == RESULT_DECL))
> +       {
> +         tree base = get_base_address (lhs);

Probably easier and more complete to do

            if (lhs && TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
              {
                 tree base = get_base_address (lhs);


I don't like the patch too much, but it looks reasonable.  At least reverting
your patch doesn't really fix anything.

Any opinions from others?

Thanks,
Richard.

> +         if (base
> +             && (TREE_CODE (base) == VAR_DECL
> +                 || TREE_CODE (base) == RESULT_DECL)
> +             && DECL_IGNORED_P (base)
> +             && !TREE_STATIC (base)
> +             && !DECL_EXTERNAL (base)
> +             && (TREE_CODE (base) != VAR_DECL
> +                 || !DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (base)))
> +           DECL_NONSHAREABLE (base) = 1;
> +       }
> +
>       /* Create new names for all the definitions created by COPY and
>         add replacement mappings for each new name.  */
>       FOR_EACH_SSA_DEF_OPERAND (def_p, copy, op_iter, SSA_OP_ALL_DEFS)
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr49103.f90.jj    2011-05-31 13:52:43.000000000 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr49103.f90       2011-05-31 13:57:16.000000000 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +! PR fortran/49103
> +! { dg-do run }
> +  integer :: a(2), b(2), i, j
> +  open (10, status='scratch')
> +  do j = 1, 2
> +    a = (/ 0, 0 /)
> +    b = (/ 1, 1 /)
> +    do i = 1, 2
> +      write (10, *) a
> +      write (10, *) b
> +    end do
> +  end do
> +  rewind (10)
> +  do i = 0, 7
> +    read (10, *) a
> +    if (any (a .ne. mod (i, 2))) call abort
> +  end do
> +  close (10)
> +end
>
>        Jakub
>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-07 10:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-07  6:32 Jakub Jelinek
2011-06-07 10:24 ` Richard Guenther [this message]
2011-06-07 13:49   ` Michael Matz
2011-06-13 22:37   ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-06-14 10:16     ` Richard Guenther

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='BANLkTinrmv=rJDuh8T0sKtpO=eMEpiqNdg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).