From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>,
Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas.biveinis@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [gc-improv] Permanent vs function RTL obstack fix
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinrxQ61-8dDhUV-FE40U9VD3npR1g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110412070107.GB17079@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 08:33:56AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> I think all these comments from you "old guys" ;-) are more
>> discouraging than fair. What Laurynas and Bernd have done, is nothing
>
> It is IMHO completely fair to point that the risks this brings in
> a huge maintainance nightmare are very high.
And IM-equally-HO it is completely unfair to talk about risks in any
situation where there is nothing yet to talk about! Give it a chance
and wait for something that's more than just an idea, and then assess
the risks based on an implementation.
Or just say "this won't fly" now so that people who would like to work
on this can turn their attention to something else. Also fine. Really.
Ciao!
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 6:17 Laurynas Biveinis
2011-04-07 21:33 ` Steven Bosscher
2011-04-08 13:22 ` Laurynas Biveinis
2011-04-08 14:36 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-08 14:39 ` Richard Guenther
2011-04-08 14:42 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-09 10:34 ` Steven Bosscher
2011-04-10 18:27 ` Laurynas Biveinis
2011-04-10 18:49 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2011-04-11 20:03 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-12 0:22 ` Mike Stump
2011-04-12 2:54 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-12 6:34 ` Steven Bosscher
2011-04-12 7:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2011-04-12 8:45 ` Steven Bosscher [this message]
2011-04-12 10:44 ` Mike Stump
2011-04-12 10:49 ` Steven Bosscher
2011-04-12 15:02 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-12 11:56 ` Bernd Schmidt
2011-04-12 15:31 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-10 18:23 ` Laurynas Biveinis
2011-04-10 22:33 ` Steven Bosscher
2011-04-11 20:08 ` Jeff Law
2011-04-12 11:43 ` Laurynas Biveinis
2011-04-12 11:46 ` Laurynas Biveinis
2011-04-12 17:25 ` Mike Stump
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTinrxQ61-8dDhUV-FE40U9VD3npR1g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=stevenb.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=laurynas.biveinis@gmail.com \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).