From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-294735-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18425 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2011 20:02:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 18410 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2011 20:02:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:01:51 +0000
Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so3230199pzk.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.249.27 with SMTP id w27mr695833wfh.78.1308513710461; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.82.21 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jun 2011 13:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinfhzGcg6oBVeV_LXRQSN1gmtU70g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik8RB9N52grGxMbpj14jwzoLB0oRYdKnmAXyESu@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTimtcwsV8Af7a60Jz57g-J38oR==+Ew7BqQvMbJm@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTikBAnrYSRiRtaPXNat77sEgdSEK1Q@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=M3HKXJa7t3ayavtWMgRPQ6t2row@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTin34R=s+4zPf7oijd_xzd00xjOLCQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTikfADfNqvuzcsru_RjE8jyiWjFvPw@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTi=vTT_9j33U5FVNVasqkdt_=qCOyQ@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinfhzGcg6oBVeV_LXRQSN1gmtU70g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:31:00 -0000
Message-ID: <BANLkTint+SNsmQxOz-4xk0rrhRPc9L8J8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: PR target/46770: Use .init_array/.fini_array sections
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01420.txt.bz2

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:39 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:

>>> I can't approve the configury changes and would like to defer
>>> to target maintainers for the target specific changes. =A0That said,
>>> I'm not familiar enough with the area of the patch. =A0But yes,
>>> it's stage1 now - so if anyone else wants to approve this patch...
>>
>> My first attempt:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00589.html
>>
>> only affects x86. =A0I changed it to generic based on the
>> feedbacks. =A0But other target maintainers show no interests.
>> Should I make it x86 only first? =A0Each target can enable it
>> if needed.
>>
>
> I am enclosing 2 patches here. =A0One only affects Linux/x86
> and the other covers all targets. =A0I tested both versions on
> Linux/x86 without any regressions. =A0Since I only got OK from
> one target maintainer and I have been pinging on this patch
> for more than 6 months, I'd like to get it enabled for Linux/x86
> soon.
>
> Uros, can I check in Linux/x86 version if there are no full feedbacks
> from the rest of target maintainers for more than 48hours. =A0We can
> enable other targets on a target by target basis later.

Sorry, but I don't feel confident enough to review the patch in this
part of the compiler. I would prefer if somebody else approves it.

Uros.