> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jakub Jelinek
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][Cilkplus] Fix pragma simd info being lost
> 
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:01:48PM +0000, Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> > > Why do you think fatal_error is the right thing here?  Why doesn't
> > > normal error work?  Generally, if one function contains 10 #pragma
> > > simd loops that require vectorization and 5 out of them aren't
> > > vectorized, it is nicer for users to be told about all 5 of them, rather than just
> the first one.
> > > fatal_error will exit immediately.
> >
> > The #pragma simd assert requires the compiler to halt compilation if
> > the loop is not vectorized.  This is why I used fatal_error.  The
> > default case is noassert.
> 
> The compilation is halted even with error, compiler will exit with non-zero exit
> status, won't compile any further functions, etc.

Here is a patch where I have replaced all fatal_errors with error_at.

Thanks,

Balaji V. Iyer.

> 
> 	Jakub