From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 78133 invoked by alias); 6 May 2015 18:57:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 78123 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2015 18:57:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: BLU004-OMC3S17.hotmail.com Received: from blu004-omc3s17.hotmail.com (HELO BLU004-OMC3S17.hotmail.com) (65.55.116.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 06 May 2015 18:57:09 +0000 Received: from BLU436-SMTP200 ([65.55.116.72]) by BLU004-OMC3S17.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 6 May 2015 11:57:07 -0700 X-TMN: [U+zLmwJoGa/d3wW4gVb1bSzGIf4K9MZ/] Message-ID: Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 18:57:00 -0000 From: John David Anglin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kyrill Tkachov , Jeff Law , GCC Patches CC: Honggyu Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH][expr.c] PR 65358 Avoid clobbering partial argument during sibcall References: <550ADF8F.7030300@arm.com> <55314236.2000806@redhat.com> <5534B811.2020107@arm.com> <55353F25.9010906@redhat.com> <55360AA0.9070106@arm.com> <55365A06.7010408@redhat.com> <553689F0.5090606@arm.com> <55378B54.2040904@arm.com> <553E0B9B.4040902@arm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2 On 2015-04-27 9:16 AM, John David Anglin wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> Would it be possible for you to test this patch on a 64-bit hppa >> or at least bootstrap it? >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01288.html > I started a build and test with your patch on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 this > morning. The patch didn't cause any regressions on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.anglin@bell.net