public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Subject: [PING][PATCH] Include safe-ctype.h after C++ standard headers, to avoid over-poisoning
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 19:00:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C34AA1AE-D96C-40DD-A139-2821C7A91C05@andric.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0623E896-6B99-49EC-9144-B41BC51089F0@andric.com>

Ping. It would be nice to get this QoL fix in.

-Dimitry

> On 28 Sep 2023, at 18:37, Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> wrote:
> 
> Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
> 
> When building gcc's C++ sources against recent libc++, the poisoning of
> the ctype macros due to including safe-ctype.h before including C++
> standard headers such as <list>, <map>, etc, causes many compilation
> errors, similar to:
> 
> In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/gensupport.cc:23:
> In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/system.h:233:
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/vector:321:
> In file included from
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_bool.h:20:
> In file included from
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_integral.h:32:
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/locale:202:
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:546:5: error: '__abi_tag__' attribute
> only applies to structs, variables, functions, and namespaces
>   546 |     _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
>       |     ^
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:813:37: note: expanded from macro
> '_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY'
>   813 | #  define _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI
>       |                                     ^
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__config:792:26: note: expanded from macro
> '_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI'
>   792 |
>   __attribute__((__abi_tag__(_LIBCPP_TOSTRING(
> _LIBCPP_VERSIONED_IDENTIFIER))))
>       |                          ^
> In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/gensupport.cc:23:
> In file included from /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/system.h:233:
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/vector:321:
> In file included from
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_bool.h:20:
> In file included from
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__format/formatter_integral.h:32:
> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/locale:202:
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:547:37: error: expected ';' at end of
> declaration list
>   547 |     char_type toupper(char_type __c) const
>       |                                     ^
> /usr/include/c++/v1/__locale:553:48: error: too many arguments
> provided to function-like macro invocation
>   553 |     const char_type* toupper(char_type* __low, const
>   char_type* __high) const
>       |                                                ^
> /home/dim/src/gcc/master/gcc/../include/safe-ctype.h:146:9: note:
> macro 'toupper' defined here
>   146 | #define toupper(c) do_not_use_toupper_with_safe_ctype
>       |         ^
> 
> This is because libc++ uses different transitive includes than
> libstdc++, and some of those transitive includes pull in various ctype
> declarations (typically via <locale>).
> 
> There was already a special case for including <string> before
> safe-ctype.h, so move the rest of the C++ standard header includes to
> the same location, to fix the problem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
> ---
> gcc/system.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/system.h b/gcc/system.h
> index e924152ad4c..7a516b11438 100644
> --- a/gcc/system.h
> +++ b/gcc/system.h
> @@ -194,27 +194,8 @@ extern int fprintf_unlocked (FILE *, const char *, ...);
> #undef fread_unlocked
> #undef fwrite_unlocked
> 
> -/* Include <string> before "safe-ctype.h" to avoid GCC poisoning
> -   the ctype macros through safe-ctype.h */
> -
> -#ifdef __cplusplus
> -#ifdef INCLUDE_STRING
> -# include <string>
> -#endif
> -#endif
> -
> -/* There are an extraordinary number of issues with <ctype.h>.
> -   The last straw is that it varies with the locale.  Use libiberty's
> -   replacement instead.  */
> -#include "safe-ctype.h"
> -
> -#include <sys/types.h>
> -
> -#include <errno.h>
> -
> -#if !defined (errno) && defined (HAVE_DECL_ERRNO) && !HAVE_DECL_ERRNO
> -extern int errno;
> -#endif
> +/* Include C++ standard headers before "safe-ctype.h" to avoid GCC
> +   poisoning the ctype macros through safe-ctype.h */
> 
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> #if defined (INCLUDE_ALGORITHM) || !defined (HAVE_SWAP_IN_UTILITY)
> @@ -229,6 +210,9 @@ extern int errno;
> #ifdef INCLUDE_SET
> # include <set>
> #endif
> +#ifdef INCLUDE_STRING
> +# include <string>
> +#endif
> #ifdef INCLUDE_VECTOR
> # include <vector>
> #endif
> @@ -245,6 +229,19 @@ extern int errno;
> # include <type_traits>
> #endif
> 
> +/* There are an extraordinary number of issues with <ctype.h>.
> +   The last straw is that it varies with the locale.  Use libiberty's
> +   replacement instead.  */
> +#include "safe-ctype.h"
> +
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +
> +#include <errno.h>
> +
> +#if !defined (errno) && defined (HAVE_DECL_ERRNO) && !HAVE_DECL_ERRNO
> +extern int errno;
> +#endif
> +
> /* Some of glibc's string inlines cause warnings.  Plus we'd rather
>   rely on (and therefore test) GCC's string builtins.  */
> #define __NO_STRING_INLINES
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-26 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28 16:37 [PATCH] " Dimitry Andric
2023-10-26 17:00 ` Dimitry Andric [this message]
2023-10-29 13:08   ` [PING][PATCH] " Sam James
2024-01-20  9:17     ` Sam James
2024-01-30 15:07       ` Sam James
2024-01-30 20:27         ` Sam James
2024-01-30 16:19 ` [PATCH] " Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C34AA1AE-D96C-40DD-A139-2821C7A91C05@andric.com \
    --to=dimitry@andric.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gerald@pfeifer.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).