From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Nick Alcock via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][version 6] add -ftrivial-auto-var-init and variable attribute "uninitialized" to gcc
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:00:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C420D76E-4FD8-495D-98F9-D2005B645F59@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.2108111558190.11781@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>
> On Aug 11, 2021, at 8:58 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, Richard,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2021, at 10:22 AM, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Especially in the VLA case but likely also in general (though unlikely
>>>>>>>>>> since usually the receiver of initializations are simple enough). I'd
>>>>>>>>>> expect the VLA case end up as
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *ptr_to_decl = .DEFERRED_INIT (...);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> where *ptr_to_decl is the DECL_VALUE_EXPR of the decl.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, for the following small testing case:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ====
>>>>>>>>> extern void bar (int);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> void foo(int n)
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> int arr[n];
>>>>>>>>> bar (arr[2]);
>>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> =====
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If I compile it with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -fdump-tree-gimple -S -o auto-init-11.s -fdump-rtl-expand, the *.gimple dump is:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =====
>>>>>>>>> void foo (int n)
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> int n.0;
>>>>>>>>> sizetype D.1950;
>>>>>>>>> bitsizetype D.1951;
>>>>>>>>> sizetype D.1952;
>>>>>>>>> bitsizetype D.1953;
>>>>>>>>> sizetype D.1954;
>>>>>>>>> int[0:D.1950] * arr.1;
>>>>>>>>> void * saved_stack.2;
>>>>>>>>> int arr[0:D.1950] [value-expr: *arr.1];
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> saved_stack.2 = __builtin_stack_save ();
>>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> n.0 = n;
>>>>>>>>> _1 = (long int) n.0;
>>>>>>>>> _2 = _1 + -1;
>>>>>>>>> _3 = (sizetype) _2;
>>>>>>>>> D.1950 = _3;
>>>>>>>>> _4 = (sizetype) n.0;
>>>>>>>>> _5 = (bitsizetype) _4;
>>>>>>>>> _6 = _5 * 32;
>>>>>>>>> D.1951 = _6;
>>>>>>>>> _7 = (sizetype) n.0;
>>>>>>>>> _8 = _7 * 4;
>>>>>>>>> D.1952 = _8;
>>>>>>>>> _9 = (sizetype) n.0;
>>>>>>>>> _10 = (bitsizetype) _9;
>>>>>>>>> _11 = _10 * 32;
>>>>>>>>> D.1953 = _11;
>>>>>>>>> _12 = (sizetype) n.0;
>>>>>>>>> _13 = _12 * 4;
>>>>>>>>> D.1954 = _13;
>>>>>>>>> arr.1 = __builtin_alloca_with_align (D.1954, 32);
>>>>>>>>> arr = .DEFERRED_INIT (D.1952, 2, 1);
>>>>>>>>> _14 = (*arr.1)[2];
>>>>>>>>> bar (_14);
>>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> finally
>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>> __builtin_stack_restore (saved_stack.2);
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ====
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You think that the above .DEFEERED_INIT is not correct?
>>>>>>>>> It should be:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *arr.1 = .DEFERRED_INIT (D.1952. 2, 1);
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I updated gimplify.c for VLA and now it emits the call to .DEFERRED_INIT as:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arr.1 = __builtin_alloca_with_align (D.1954, 32);
>>>>>>> *arr.1 = .DEFERRED_INIT (D.1952, 2, 1);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, this call triggered the assertion failure in verify_gimple_call of tree-cfg.c because the LHS is not a valid LHS.
>>>>>>> Then I modify tree-cfg.c as:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
>>>>>>> index 330eb7dd89bf..180d4f1f9e32 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
>>>>>>> @@ -3375,7 +3375,11 @@ verify_gimple_call (gcall *stmt)
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tree lhs = gimple_call_lhs (stmt);
>>>>>>> + /* For .DEFERRED_INIT call, the LHS might be an indirection of
>>>>>>> + a pointer for the VLA variable, which is not a valid LHS of
>>>>>>> + a gimple call, we ignore the asssertion on this. */
>>>>>>> if (lhs
>>>>>>> + && (!gimple_call_internal_p (stmt, IFN_DEFERRED_INIT))
>>>>>>> && (!is_gimple_reg (lhs)
>>>>>>> && (!is_gimple_lvalue (lhs)
>>>>>>> || verify_types_in_gimple_reference
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The assertion failure in tree-cfg.c got resolved, but I got another assertion failure in operands_scanner::get_expr_operands (tree *expr_p, int flags), line 945:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 939 /* If we get here, something has gone wrong. */
>>>>>>> 940 if (flag_checking)
>>>>>>> 941 {
>>>>>>> 942 fprintf (stderr, "unhandled expression in get_expr_operands():\n");
>>>>>>> 943 debug_tree (expr);
>>>>>>> 944 fputs ("\n", stderr);
>>>>>>> 945 gcc_unreachable ();
>>>>>>> 946 }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like that the gimple statement:
>>>>>>> *arr.1 = .DEFERRED_INIT (D.1952, 2, 1);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is not valid. i.e, the LHS should not be an indirection to a pointer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How to resolve this issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> It sounds like the LHS is an INDIRECT_REF maybe? That means it's
>>>>> still not properly gimplified because it should end up as a MEM_REF
>>>>> instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> But I'm just guessing here ... if you are in a debugger then you can
>>>>> invoke debug_tree (lhs) in the inferior to see what it exactly is
>>>>> at the point of the failure.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, it’s an INDIRECT_REF at the point of the failure even though I added a
>>>>
>>>> gimplify_var_or_parm_decl (lhs)
>>>
>>> I think the easiest is to build the .DEFERRED_INIT as GENERIC
>>> and use gimplify_assign () to gimplify and add the result
>>> to the sequence. Thus, build a GENERIC CALL_EXPR and then
>>> gimplify_assign (lhs, call_expr, seq);
>>
>> Which utility routine is used to build an Internal generic call?
>> Currently, I used “gimple_build_call_internal” to build this internal gimple call.
>>
>> For the generic call, shall I use “build_call_expr_loc” ?
>
> For example look at build_asan_poison_call_expr which does such thing
> for ASAN poison internal function call insertion at gimplification time.
Okay, got it.
Will try.
Qing
>
> Richard.
>
>> Qing
>>
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>>> Qing
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I came up with the following solution:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Define the IFN_DEFERRED_INIT function as:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LHS = DEFERRED_INIT (SIZE of the DECL, INIT_TYPE, IS_VLA);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if IS_VLA is false, the LHS is the DECL itself,
>>>>>> if IS_VLA is true, the LHS is the pointer to this DECL that created by
>>>>>> gimplify_vla_decl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The benefit of this solution are:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Resolved the invalid IR issue;
>>>>>> 2. The call stmt carries the address of the VLA natually;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The issue with this solution is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For VLA and non-VLA, the LHS will be different,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you see any other potential issues with this solution?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Qing
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
>>>>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
>>>>> Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
>>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
>>> Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
>>
>>
>
> --
> Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg,
> Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-11 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-27 3:26 Qing Zhao
2021-07-28 20:21 ` Kees Cook
2021-07-28 21:53 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 14:09 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-09 16:38 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-09 17:14 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 7:36 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 13:39 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 14:16 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:02 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 15:22 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-10 15:55 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 20:16 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-10 22:26 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 7:02 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:33 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:37 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 13:54 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 13:58 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 14:00 ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2021-08-11 15:30 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 15:53 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:22 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:55 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-11 16:57 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 20:30 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 22:03 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 7:12 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 14:48 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 15:08 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:39 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 7:11 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 16:48 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 15:04 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 20:40 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18 7:19 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 14:39 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 9:02 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 13:44 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-11 16:15 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-08-11 16:29 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 19:24 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-12 22:45 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 7:40 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-16 15:45 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 8:29 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:50 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 16:08 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-18 7:15 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-18 16:02 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-19 9:00 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-19 13:54 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-20 14:52 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-23 13:55 ` Richard Biener
2021-09-02 17:24 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-16 19:49 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 8:43 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:03 ` Qing Zhao
2021-08-17 14:45 ` Richard Biener
2021-08-17 14:53 ` Qing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C420D76E-4FD8-495D-98F9-D2005B645F59@oracle.com \
--to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).