public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	 kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
	 rdapp.gcc <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Avoid unnecessary slideup in compress pattern of vec_perm
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 22:31:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C5784815AA9C46F9+202309102231256648803@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b45b8b44-5dac-45dd-aaff-f65eb8b58906@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1657 bytes --]

Address comment: [PATCH V2] RISC-V: Avoid unnecessary slideup in compress pattern of vec_perm (gnu.org)



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-09-10 21:34
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; kito.cheng; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Avoid unnecessary slideup in compress pattern of vec_perm
 
 
On 9/9/23 21:55, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> If a const vector all elements are same, the slide up is unnecessary.
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> * config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (shuffle_compress_patterns): Avoid unnecessary slideup.
> 
> ---
>   gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> index bee60de1d26..7ef884907b8 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> @@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ shuffle_compress_patterns (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
>     rtx mask = force_reg (mask_mode, builder.build ());
>   
>     rtx merge = d->op1;
> -  if (need_slideup_p)
> +  if (need_slideup_p && !const_vec_duplicate_p (d->op1))
>       {
>         int slideup_cnt = vlen - (d->perm[vlen - 1].to_constant () % vlen) - 1;
>         rtx ops[] = {d->target, d->op1, gen_int_mode (slideup_cnt, Pmode)};
Would it be better to adjust how we compute need_slidup_p to check 
!const_vec_duplicate_p (d->op1) instead of doing it here?
 
That way the name "need_slideup_p" stays consistent with the intent of 
the code.  It would also mean we wouldn't need to duplicate the 
additional check if we wanted to model the use of slideup in the cost 
calculations.
 
Jeff
 

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-10 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-10  3:55 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-09-10 13:34 ` Jeff Law
2023-09-10 14:31   ` 钟居哲 [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C5784815AA9C46F9+202309102231256648803@rivai.ai \
    --to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).