From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 960CC3858417 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2022 02:38:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 960CC3858417 Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id az20so7732925vsb.8 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:38:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9oDuXI5xHMzUXzEI47XrmhL9a0c4VP/Gy2fPKQ2d2tc=; b=i4i2H1cqG+ObI5aWN5sun62NaKxzyXNv24K9rYwsjpsE00G4y+3wPlWIMcPICV+xCA paQhiFdjhxIA7NCo+mAhB2Vcbddchg/R8gUalS5BnLN3R+ISjN1IKpJYt6saxiIhW1XR hNh7nA/22DXiYJVytdbeMklXv+VgpznlX8SUWSCMWYMek2ouEV9Y1L+HrGVYA3hlhl1q vRe0daL/cFpst+7P4YJTPiaDXUawqAMm1LCG/XRCwcCQritu5ooWz3K3gFRn9w1UTJGk EPlKgzDfzcLngj07MT8KJYdAEKxOuymGieLS4Q3/hiiZm5SqHywztl6bq+IqSdBYhk7Y wuUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533BkQqt+LaF72XWpT36l023Ok8x29zmW6jGB5pp4fj76RW7/09b 555mn8RLvlNZyRmUc3vCQHL4V19SYiIlTW+mxOo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzG6RE4zmlMMboahgyO92weaw5bq6H4FHib9JGvRDhvRUsxw8sEWyUs9xqBqJOecHn3TxjCBoA5qW12BQJ/JUc= X-Received: by 2002:a67:e096:: with SMTP id f22mr6324593vsl.8.1643510304152; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:38:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220129162334.GV2646553@tucnak> In-Reply-To: From: Andrew Pinski Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:38:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] match.pd: Fix up 1 / X for unsigned X optimization [PR104280] To: Zhao Wei Liew Cc: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches , Richard Biener Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 02:38:26 -0000 On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 6:30 PM Zhao Wei Liew via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Sincere apologies for the issues. I wasn't aware of the need for a cast but > after reading the PRs, I understand that now. On the other hand, the > incorrect test case was simply a major oversight on my part. > > I'll be sure to be more careful next time. Well I think gimple-match should have caught the cast issue really. I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104286 for that. I hope to submit a patch for stage 1 to catch that so it will be harder to happen in the first place. Thanks, Andrew > > Thanks for the fixes!