public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4] [AARCH64] Fix PR target/103100 -mstrict-align and memset on not aligned buffers
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 05:10:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+=Sn1ki5CTGJA_DmsrAj73DpLzPWmjZGGOX6fFATOik5Y5Ghw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+=Sn1n48U+kouRpGqgSmY9H-SPCVbOK1-okwHCWx46e3yu2tw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 10:28 AM Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:54 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > The problem here is that aarch64_expand_setmem does not change the alignment
> > for strict alignment case.
> > This is version 4 of the fix, major changes from the last version is fixing
> > the way store pairs are handled which allows handling of storing 2 SI mode
> > at a time.
> > This also adds a testcase to show a case with -mstrict-align we can do
> > the store word pair stores.
> >
> > OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
>
> Ping?

Ping?


>
> >
> >         PR target/103100
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_gen_store_pair):
> >         Add support for SImode.
> >         (aarch64_set_one_block_and_progress_pointer):
> >         Add use_pair argument and rewrite and simplifying the
> >         code.
> >         (aarch64_can_use_pair_load_stores): New function.
> >         (aarch64_expand_setmem): Rewrite mode selection to
> >         better handle strict alignment and non ld/stp pair case.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-1.c: Update test.
> >         Reduce the size down to 207 and make s1 global and aligned
> >         to 16 bytes.
> >         * gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-2.c: New test.
> >         * gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-3.c: New test.
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc                 | 136 ++++++++++--------
> >  .../aarch64/memset-strict-align-1.c           |  19 ++-
> >  .../aarch64/memset-strict-align-2.c           |  14 ++
> >  .../aarch64/memset-strict-align-3.c           |  15 ++
> >  4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-2.c
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-3.c
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > index 5c40b6ed22a..3eaf9bd608a 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > @@ -8850,6 +8850,9 @@ aarch64_gen_store_pair (machine_mode mode, rtx mem1, rtx reg1, rtx mem2,
> >  {
> >    switch (mode)
> >      {
> > +    case E_SImode:
> > +      return gen_store_pair_sw_sisi (mem1, reg1, mem2, reg2);
> > +
> >      case E_DImode:
> >        return gen_store_pair_dw_didi (mem1, reg1, mem2, reg2);
> >
> > @@ -24896,42 +24899,49 @@ aarch64_expand_cpymem (rtx *operands)
> >     SRC is a register we have created with the duplicated value to be set.  */
> >  static void
> >  aarch64_set_one_block_and_progress_pointer (rtx src, rtx *dst,
> > -                                           machine_mode mode)
> > +                                           machine_mode mode, bool use_pairs)
> >  {
> > +  rtx reg = src;
> >    /* If we are copying 128bits or 256bits, we can do that straight from
> >       the SIMD register we prepared.  */
> > -  if (known_eq (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode), 256))
> > -    {
> > -      mode = GET_MODE (src);
> > -      /* "Cast" the *dst to the correct mode.  */
> > -      *dst = adjust_address (*dst, mode, 0);
> > -      /* Emit the memset.  */
> > -      emit_insn (aarch64_gen_store_pair (mode, *dst, src,
> > -                                        aarch64_progress_pointer (*dst), src));
> > -
> > -      /* Move the pointers forward.  */
> > -      *dst = aarch64_move_pointer (*dst, 32);
> > -      return;
> > -    }
> >    if (known_eq (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode), 128))
> > -    {
> > -      /* "Cast" the *dst to the correct mode.  */
> > -      *dst = adjust_address (*dst, GET_MODE (src), 0);
> > -      /* Emit the memset.  */
> > -      emit_move_insn (*dst, src);
> > -      /* Move the pointers forward.  */
> > -      *dst = aarch64_move_pointer (*dst, 16);
> > -      return;
> > -    }
> > -  /* For copying less, we have to extract the right amount from src.  */
> > -  rtx reg = lowpart_subreg (mode, src, GET_MODE (src));
> > +    mode = GET_MODE(src);
> > +  else
> > +    /* For copying less, we have to extract the right amount from src.  */
> > +    reg = lowpart_subreg (mode, src, GET_MODE (src));
> >
> >    /* "Cast" the *dst to the correct mode.  */
> >    *dst = adjust_address (*dst, mode, 0);
> >    /* Emit the memset.  */
> > -  emit_move_insn (*dst, reg);
> > +  if (use_pairs)
> > +    emit_insn (aarch64_gen_store_pair (mode, *dst, reg,
> > +                                      aarch64_progress_pointer (*dst),
> > +                                      reg));
> > +  else
> > +    emit_move_insn (*dst, reg);
> > +
> >    /* Move the pointer forward.  */
> >    *dst = aarch64_progress_pointer (*dst);
> > +  if (use_pairs)
> > +    *dst = aarch64_progress_pointer (*dst);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Returns true if size can be used as a store/load pair.
> > +   This is a helper function for aarch64_expand_setmem and others. */
> > +static bool
> > +aarch64_can_use_pair_load_stores (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT size)
> > +{
> > +  /* For DI and SI modes, we can use store pairs.  */
> > +  if (size == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (DImode)
> > +      || size == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SImode))
> > +    return true;
> > +  /* For TI mode, we will use store pairs only if
> > +     the target wants to. */
> > +  else if (size == GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TImode)
> > +      && !(aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags
> > +          & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS))
> > +    return true;
> > +  return false;
> >  }
> >
> >  /* Expand a setmem using the MOPS instructions.  OPERANDS are the same
> > @@ -24974,9 +24984,21 @@ aarch64_expand_setmem (rtx *operands)
> >
> >    bool size_p = optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun);
> >
> > -  /* Default the maximum to 256-bytes when considering only libcall vs
> > -     SIMD broadcast sequence.  */
> > -  unsigned max_set_size = 256;
> > +  /* Maximum amount to copy in one go (without taking into account store pairs).  */
> > +  int copy_limit = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TImode);
> > +
> > +  /* For strict alignment case, restrict the copy limit to the compiler time
> > +     known alignment of the memory.  */
> > +  if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
> > +    copy_limit = MIN (copy_limit, (int)MEM_ALIGN (dst));
> > +
> > +  bool use_pairs = aarch64_can_use_pair_load_stores (copy_limit);
> > +
> > +  /* The max set size is 8 instructions of the copy_limit sized stores
> > +     (also taking into account using pair stores or not);
> > +     for the non strict alignment, this is 256 bytes.  */
> > +  unsigned max_set_size;
> > +  max_set_size = (copy_limit * (use_pairs ? 2 : 1) * 8) / BITS_PER_UNIT;
> >
> >    len = INTVAL (operands[1]);
> >    if (len > max_set_size && !TARGET_MOPS)
> > @@ -24990,8 +25012,10 @@ aarch64_expand_setmem (rtx *operands)
> >      (zero constants can use XZR directly).  */
> >    unsigned mops_cost = 3 + 1 + cst_val;
> >    /* A libcall to memset in the worst case takes 3 instructions to prepare
> > -     the arguments + 1 for the call.  */
> > -  unsigned libcall_cost = 4;
> > +     the arguments + 1 for the call.
> > +     In the case of not optimizing for size the cost of doing a libcall
> > +     is 17 instructions . */
> > +  unsigned libcall_cost = size_p ? 4 : 17;
> >
> >    /* Upper bound check.  For large constant-sized setmem use the MOPS sequence
> >       when available.  */
> > @@ -25001,12 +25025,12 @@ aarch64_expand_setmem (rtx *operands)
> >
> >    /* Attempt a sequence with a vector broadcast followed by stores.
> >       Count the number of operations involved to see if it's worth it
> > -     against the alternatives.  A simple counter simd_ops on the
> > +     against the alternatives.  A simple counter inlined_ops on the
> >       algorithmically-relevant operations is used rather than an rtx_insn count
> >       as all the pointer adjusmtents and mode reinterprets will be optimized
> >       away later.  */
> >    start_sequence ();
> > -  unsigned simd_ops = 0;
> > +  unsigned inlined_ops = 0;
> >
> >    base = copy_to_mode_reg (Pmode, XEXP (dst, 0));
> >    dst = adjust_automodify_address (dst, VOIDmode, base, 0);
> > @@ -25014,16 +25038,10 @@ aarch64_expand_setmem (rtx *operands)
> >    /* Prepare the val using a DUP/MOVI v0.16B, val.  */
> >    src = expand_vector_broadcast (V16QImode, val);
> >    src = force_reg (V16QImode, src);
> > -  simd_ops++;
> > +  inlined_ops++;
> >    /* Convert len to bits to make the rest of the code simpler.  */
> >    n = len * BITS_PER_UNIT;
> >
> > -  /* Maximum amount to copy in one go.  We allow 256-bit chunks based on the
> > -     AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS tuning parameter.  */
> > -  const int copy_limit = (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags
> > -                         & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS)
> > -                         ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (TImode) : 256;
> > -
> >    while (n > 0)
> >      {
> >        /* Find the largest mode in which to do the copy without
> > @@ -25036,15 +25054,18 @@ aarch64_expand_setmem (rtx *operands)
> >        gcc_assert (cur_mode != BLKmode);
> >
> >        mode_bits = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (cur_mode).to_constant ();
> > -      aarch64_set_one_block_and_progress_pointer (src, &dst, cur_mode);
> > -      simd_ops++;
> > -      n -= mode_bits;
> > +      bool pairs = aarch64_can_use_pair_load_stores (mode_bits);
> > +      if (n < (mode_bits * 2))
> > +       pairs = false;
> > +      aarch64_set_one_block_and_progress_pointer (src, &dst, cur_mode, pairs);
> > +      inlined_ops++;
> > +      n -= mode_bits * (pairs ? 2 : 1);
> >
> >        /* Do certain trailing copies as overlapping if it's going to be
> >          cheaper.  i.e. less instructions to do so.  For instance doing a 15
> >          byte copy it's more efficient to do two overlapping 8 byte copies than
> >          8 + 4 + 2 + 1.  Only do this when -mstrict-align is not supplied.  */
> > -      if (n > 0 && n < copy_limit / 2 && !STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
> > +      if (n > 0 && n < copy_limit && !STRICT_ALIGNMENT)
> >         {
> >           next_mode = smallest_mode_for_size (n, MODE_INT);
> >           int n_bits = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (next_mode).to_constant ();
> > @@ -25056,24 +25077,17 @@ aarch64_expand_setmem (rtx *operands)
> >    rtx_insn *seq = get_insns ();
> >    end_sequence ();
> >
> > -  if (size_p)
> > -    {
> > -      /* When optimizing for size we have 3 options: the SIMD broadcast sequence,
> > -        call to memset or the MOPS expansion.  */
> > -      if (TARGET_MOPS
> > -         && mops_cost <= libcall_cost
> > -         && mops_cost <= simd_ops)
> > -       return aarch64_expand_setmem_mops (operands);
> > -      /* If MOPS is not available or not shorter pick a libcall if the SIMD
> > -        sequence is too long.  */
> > -      else if (libcall_cost < simd_ops)
> > -       return false;
> > -      emit_insn (seq);
> > -      return true;
> > -    }
> > +  /* When optimizing for size we have 3 options: the inlined sequence,
> > +     call to memset or the MOPS expansion.  */
> > +  if (size_p
> > +      && TARGET_MOPS
> > +      && mops_cost <= libcall_cost
> > +      && mops_cost <= inlined_ops)
> > +    return aarch64_expand_setmem_mops (operands);
> > +  /* Pick a libcall if the inlined sequence is too long.  */
> > +  else if (libcall_cost < inlined_ops)
> > +    return false;
> >
> > -  /* At this point the SIMD broadcast sequence is the best choice when
> > -     optimizing for speed.  */
> >    emit_insn (seq);
> >    return true;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-1.c
> > index 664d43aee13..63c864b25b0 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-1.c
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-1.c
> > @@ -1,28 +1,27 @@
> >  /* { dg-do compile } */
> >  /* { dg-options "-O2 -mstrict-align" } */
> >
> > -struct s { char x[255]; };
> > +struct s { char x[207]; };
> > +struct s s1 __attribute__((aligned(16)));
> >  void foo (struct s *);
> > -void bar (void) { struct s s1 = {}; foo (&s1); }
> > +void bar (void) { s1 = (struct s){}; foo (&s1); }
> >
> > -/* memset (s1 = {}, sizeof = 255) should be expanded out
> > +/* memset (s1 = {}, sizeof = 207) should be expanded out
> >     such that there are no overlap stores when -mstrict-align
> >     is in use.
> > -   so 7 pairs of 16 bytes stores (224 bytes).
> > -   1 16 byte stores
> > +   so 6 pairs of 16 bytes stores (96 bytes).
> >     1 8 byte store
> >     1 4 byte store
> >     1 2 byte store
> >     1 1 byte store
> >     */
> >
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tq" 7 } } */
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "str\tq" 1 } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tq" 6 } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "str\tq" 0 } } */
> >  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "str\txzr" 1 } } */
> >  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "str\twzr" 1 } } */
> >  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "strh\twzr" 1 } } */
> >  /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "strb\twzr" 1 } } */
> >
> > -/* Also one store pair for the frame-pointer and the LR. */
> > -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tx" 1 } } */
> > -
> > +/* No store pair with 8 byte words is needed as foo is called with a sibcall. */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\tx" 0 } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-2.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..650be86604b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-2.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mstrict-align" } */
> > +
> > +struct s { char x[7]; };
> > +void foo (struct s *);
> > +void bar (struct s *s1) { *s1 = (struct s){}; foo (s1); }
> > +
> > +/* memset (s1 = {}, sizeof = 7) should be expanded out
> > +   such that there are no overlap stores when -mstrict-align
> > +   is in use. As the alignment of s1 is unknown, byte stores are needed.
> > +   so 15 byte stores
> > +   */
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "strb\twzr" 7 } } */
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-3.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..09cb9a654dc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/memset-strict-align-3.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-Os -mstrict-align" } */
> > +
> > +int a[2*3];
> > +int f(int t)
> > +{
> > +  __builtin_memset(a, t, 2*3*sizeof(int));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* memset (a, (val), sizeof = 2*3*4) should be expanded out
> > +   such that there are no overlap stores when -mstrict-align
> > +   is in use. As the alignment of a is 4 byte aligned (due to -Os),
> > +   store word pairs are needed. so 3 stp are in use.  */
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "stp\ts" 3 } } */
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10  3:53 Andrew Pinski
2023-03-03 18:28 ` Andrew Pinski
2023-03-24 12:10   ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2023-04-04 17:47 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 23:42   ` Andrew Pinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+=Sn1ki5CTGJA_DmsrAj73DpLzPWmjZGGOX6fFATOik5Y5Ghw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=apinski@marvell.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).