On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:08 AM, James Greenhalgh
<james.greenhalgh@arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:00:14PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> Just like the patch for AARCH64_FUSION_PAIR, this is a patch for
>> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.  Note I tested this patch on top of the
>> patch for AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> Remove the hack for AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_ALL.
>>
>>     Remove index from AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION
>>
>>     Instead of doing an explict index in aarch64-tuning-flags.def, we
>>     should have an enum which does the index instead.  This allows
>>     you to add/remove them without worrying about the order being
>>     correct and having holes or worry about merge conficts.
>>
>>     OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
>
> -ENOPATCH, but assuming this is along the same lines as the one I just
> acked, I'm happy for you to consider this preapproved (after checking
> the comments below). Please send a copy to the list for the archives.

Attached.  Yes I just had forgot to attach it when I sent this one out.

>
>>     ChangeLog:
>>     * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def: Remove all index to
>> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.
>>     * config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h (extra_tuning_flags_index): New enum.
>
> I'm guessing that this has a more aarch64-centric name like
> aarch64_extra_tuning_flags_index ? If not, it probably should have just to
> fit with the naming scheme in the rest of the file.

That was just a copy and paste error into the ChangeLog.
The name in the aarch64-protos.h is aarch64_extra_tuning_flags_index.

>
>>     (aarch64_extra_tuning_flags): Base the shifted value on the index instead
>>     of the argument to AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION.
>>     * config/aarch64/aarch64.c: Remove the last argument to
>> AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION..
>
> Watch out for the extra . on the end of this ChangeLog line..

Got it will fix.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>>