public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr>,
		Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	dave.anglin@bell.net, 	ro@gcc.gnu.org, iains@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Commit policy? Re: [PATCH 7/7] Plug ipa-prop escape analysis into gimple_call_arg_flags
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:54:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+=Sn1mcEK+p4T1xwp8gwrYpEv6hHc49PdY0s5XB89GW2vksaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8761k9ntuy.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net>

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Thomas Schwinge
<thomas@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:55:44 +0200, I wrote:
>> Ping -- OK to commit to trunk?
>
> Even though several of those who I'd consider regular GCC developers do
> agree with this patch (see also <https://gcc.gnu.org/PR61334>), that is
> not enough "consensus" to consider this patch approved, right?  Wouldn't
> it be a good idea for GCC to move to a more "liberal" policy in this
> regard?  (That seems to work nicely for glibc.)

Really I think this is an obvious patch and would be the exact same
patch I would have came up with.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

>
>
> Ping.
>
>
>> On Wed, 28 May 2014 23:55:31 +0200, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 26 May 2014 02:16:35 -0700, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
>> > > > > r210901 breaks bootstrap on targets not supporting strnlen, e.g., darwin10.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > ../../_clean/gcc/lto-cgraph.c:976:68: error: 'strnlen' was not declared in this scope
>> > >
>> > > I'm seeing the same on MinGW, which also doesn't have strnlen (which is a
>> > > GNU extension).
>> > >
>> > > > strnlen should be declared in include/libiberty.h if there is no
>> > > > declaration as libiberty support is already there.  That should be a
>> > > > simple fix.
>> > >
>> > > Like this?
>> >
>> > This looks good to me (thoguh strnlen is posix).  I can not approve the patch
>> > but I would preffer it over just hand implementing strnlen there (that is easy,
>> > too)
>>
>> Patch is also considered good by testers in
>> <https://gcc.gnu.org/PR61334>.
>>
>> > > --- gcc/config.in
>> > > +++ gcc/config.in
>> > > [Regenerate.]
>> > > --- gcc/configure
>> > > +++ gcc/configure
>> > > [Regenerate.]
>> > > --- gcc/configure.ac
>> > > +++ gcc/configure.ac
>> > > @@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -I${srcdir} -I${srcdir}/../include $GMPINC"
>> > >  saved_CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS"
>> > >  CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -I${srcdir} -I${srcdir}/../include $GMPINC"
>> > >  gcc_AC_CHECK_DECLS(getenv atol asprintf sbrk abort atof getcwd getwd \
>> > > - strsignal strstr stpcpy strverscmp \
>> > > + stpcpy strnlen strsignal strstr strverscmp \
>> > >   errno snprintf vsnprintf vasprintf malloc realloc calloc \
>> > >   free basename getopt clock getpagesize ffs gcc_UNLOCKED_FUNCS, , ,[
>> > >  #include "ansidecl.h"
>> > > diff --git include/libiberty.h include/libiberty.h
>> > > index 7fd0703..56b8b43 100644
>> > > --- include/libiberty.h
>> > > +++ include/libiberty.h
>> > > @@ -636,6 +636,10 @@ extern int snprintf (char *, size_t, const char *, ...) ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_3;
>> > >  extern int vsnprintf (char *, size_t, const char *, va_list) ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(3,0);
>> > >  #endif
>> > >
>> > > +#if defined (HAVE_DECL_STRNLEN) && !HAVE_DECL_STRNLEN
>> > > +extern size_t strnlen (const char *, size_t);
>> > > +#endif
>> > > +
>> > >  #if defined(HAVE_DECL_STRVERSCMP) && !HAVE_DECL_STRVERSCMP
>> > >  /* Compare version strings.  */
>> > >  extern int strverscmp (const char *, const char *);
>>
>>
>> Grüße,
>>  Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-26  9:00 Dominique Dhumieres
2014-05-26  9:16 ` Andrew Pinski
2014-05-26  9:29   ` Christophe Lyon
2014-05-26 16:32     ` Jan Hubicka
2014-05-28  7:26   ` Thomas Schwinge
2014-05-28 21:55     ` Jan Hubicka
2014-06-03  9:56       ` Thomas Schwinge
2014-06-10  6:48         ` Commit policy? " Thomas Schwinge
2014-06-10  6:54           ` Andrew Pinski [this message]
2014-06-10  9:07           ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+=Sn1mcEK+p4T1xwp8gwrYpEv6hHc49PdY0s5XB89GW2vksaA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
    --cc=dominiq@lps.ens.fr \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=iains@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=ro@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).