From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=1x2t=32=gmail.com=pinskia@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56013898399
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 07:48:54 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E56013898399
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id g10so5772145plo.11
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 23:48:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=XbJlxjc0Q3WJzENsO0+dKR1Z59Q6qhPMZ52D2YGJ/3Y=;
        b=XtJA2Bhs0rQRsnL6EuK7Z6p3Yw8fQpgK6m1KT3zEWel1n+aY/LDS2ynCYK9e9YDKfL
         EA1gV/8lV12bVcvvSBlGC7QUVg2eoAkkbYv+60Xup6/xk232NMGEuDHkRLWgK6aMs5Aw
         BW5QT0xu3hUCa2er0jstGIdmCdDrAaBBoN36bQ5TKVRvok1oeEkCT4YJeEz8Jpkuj3Vx
         AZnaM2AS82FKmFn+ReiiJFsYgqDhvVUFMHqYAgxvnR4vLQvm2L8BQye0sEaDkkE8lEan
         nYEi/LwqBAb+/FWIlue7YCv81OU3Zyg1HIK/jDeLp+YUUhsMVm4LuCy9xkeMtPKQ135h
         NPMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=XbJlxjc0Q3WJzENsO0+dKR1Z59Q6qhPMZ52D2YGJ/3Y=;
        b=xCjC1LgbLez/Mn/jFKeOtzyF0tTLybdUq9FhkjGr3MiaFFpmCqrdOuBK59h1VVfubo
         5Uo++JJX05lkykIp8zxJEsyRODVTCgnng2wD115FEmCLR8dLXPB//qIGbqkHrkqvjbyK
         Z77UXwlEDt/UFrGVqcNx12wvEbiI9fQayoCA1XlOMnJkqBv69hOgBqBVRxOU2Nv3dKdQ
         zfZJ2v3Ti9KcJJBhrMtuiU1wC7TohcOvwE3HK7HkllN2rBijCZUp6gm0+acO2v710r09
         UjY3fzrViMkC6eTV9c2Hz2xWcB+HW/5af/5aQWqDpKaShWzvOrhuOJH/Jn8SVwG9JkeI
         64Rw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkUmzF9BWxDpW8Pk8wfTsJteLlHzLgdZoXmv1rS0Jt/p04jVz7u
	VJccAFlJf9fKnwOKxQEqjsJ8I7XFnURafgpVWh8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4CbgVwPbOBtN7jC2o1WYjDofqTQ+WKvCO9HRYmgt5jvgILcMgzB9GNQS1ua79HM2a5JPw9wztsq6NHcO79ULM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d38c:b0:214:ba3:4eb1 with SMTP id
 q12-20020a17090ad38c00b002140ba34eb1mr51788235pju.161.1669448933703; Fri, 25
 Nov 2022 23:48:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAEYL+X_ta9=7wKrWZT7TArBiOi79S2WzTtsqOwueUf8Vm2cjvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <8FF347A1-0569-4A57-B0AE-9760A70AA010@gmail.com> <CAEYL+X9rNbOHanPNrYmtGHXMD2NhCWRiyTXkzG=YxOPRZBAUvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEYL+X9rNbOHanPNrYmtGHXMD2NhCWRiyTXkzG=YxOPRZBAUvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 23:48:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+=Sn1njXotzb_bkfZOOhd9MDUEqvLwLS2KCVyFsQ4thWwZTtA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/56] Revert "Move void_list_node init to common code". (8ff2a92a0450243e52d3299a13b30f208bafa7e0)
To: Zopolis0 <creatorsmithmdt@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 11:37 PM Zopolis0 via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > How does the Java FE initialize void_list_node?
> https://github.com/Zopolis4/gcj/blob/master/gcc/java/builtins.cc#L503
> ```
> void_list_node = end_params_node;
> ```
>
> end_params_node is defined a couple times around the Java frontend,
> not sure which definition it is using.

What happens if you remove end_params_node from the Java front-end and
replace it with void_list_node?

Thanks,
Andrew