From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A251385780E for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:19:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2A251385780E Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id w5so17434403wrp.8 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:19:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k2kFRFkd8yNRrzt3b+R4X75BUa/l089Dt7qHkkW7Wz8=; b=LYt000yH04wM+NfMQMpNe6nnmaLwT0w6KB/0Ns3MocvdzhOgqWucxQx5um03lu2G6r ah485k4i+i5Nsq+kJrAZzJ5hAlIPJFxzXDVwlmxuWoiUaUr67EkWVa4Kxte+yuIaBiKu 8AgqprJpSYSc4Xkwvlu1srN+LMZfUSw2M0fbpoRi9NjULiHlsh8Rne3nmfyHOslP1j/y VNpDfmswRoNMBTvtgFeAeyj4Lz331ENX7lVDCAR7jLBrtDkg7ppFJiSztZg5S74QcnBU ext9BegAOT7ge+T7ZuKfiCZvfBa+cqszuBko0UPQdoqq3ivmVYtD3K+lu6nD/XZ+VLJU 5chg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531J757oKre8PJi3GtMeD+Sa+XPqBCp6sEc3u37rOLNKdpTfqGig d7eb3lYzQw8BN15e9R1rpGjjqhidbkTEDOsr7VY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQD6Pwz9EyAVfFSS3kmOKgusO9dJmAvlSS/fjWHLics6gQc/zoQy6N8V5hdZq8RJTbTt7W+Z+9os9GP4+BhZs= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e8c5:: with SMTP id k5mr14688699wrn.352.1600067980183; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 00:19:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Kito Cheng Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:19:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RISC-V: fix a typo in riscv.h To: Yeting Kuo Cc: GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:19:42 -0000 Hi Yeting: Could you provide a test case for that? On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:15 PM Yeting Kuo via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hi all, > > The patch fixes a typo that would make some errors in fast-unaligned-access > targets. > > RISC-V: fix a typo in riscv.h > > 2020-09-14 Yeting Kuo > > gcc/ > * config/riscv/riscv.h > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h > index 9f67d82e74e..b7b4a1c88a5 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h > @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ extern unsigned riscv_stack_boundary; > > /* This is the maximum value that can be represented in a compressed > load/store > offset (an unsigned 5-bit value scaled by 4). */ > -#define CSW_MAX_OFFSET ((4LL << C_S_BITS) - 1) & ~3 > +#define CSW_MAX_OFFSET (((4LL << C_S_BITS) - 1) & ~3) > > /* Called from RISCV_REORG, this is defined in riscv-sr.c. */ > > Best Regard, > Yeting