From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3045F3858C53 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:51:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3045F3858C53 Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id qn6so16658390ejc.11 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=0pjXEGM9wgoIopLZUfTpZLUsFOMHQc+83kv3Kibl7kU=; b=yV2XTaP8eCXNtgFgJxLaRWHcpfLmKWN4vcIpyAue+x+rWOAQ5F/bR2y2eW00TH2vm4 MTvxpuxsYokzJ+Dlkyy1+HSQvmlnKcSoRmgbSHL6xpa4E0bb/rxqOxE+sT4V60JICzhV Z+xV7//dGLdpi7NJfrcYnGoEI8obSHLAnSi4L1OSX6qE+RFiUuJkB6RbHfytLhXDHLP8 XWJ28euB26KU0PvL68EL7spyiKq5LtvnTDHYlKIFZK4HLn51AJ1rAuMoNju4xb0qGfy9 lTerpJ+nBRS0NUeI+hSCYytoEc410NaVlAJfIo18kwFMRVONInkIXZjoOeBzDw1lBB29 Ttxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2+340qO2HDHzqWhutIy2abnUxaHZ3Gqxk6xNgafj+TcfngWTTx VYMp/Ui+hNF/cI81eVOmexAzH5RQc73voERF7yk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5CooZHgA8hBLCj92Vh4Tv3DowkKMwueakdtISbAJO8G/yKBD6N44K5FNu1pEqjmWfq9PxMtG4zWLOYvKfbBMM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a428:b0:730:aee3:2da7 with SMTP id sg40-20020a170907a42800b00730aee32da7mr20004154ejc.613.1660146679311; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220806194122.19633-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20220806194122.19633-1-palmer@rivosinc.com> From: Kito Cheng Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 23:51:06 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix the sge ..., x0, ... pattern To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 15:51:23 -0000 LGTM, that's apparently some kind of copy & paste error (from *slt pattern) when we add this pattern. On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 3:42 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > There's no operand 2 here, so referencing it doesn't make sense. I > couldn't find a way to trigger bad assembly output so I don't have a > test. > > gcc/ChangeLog > > PR target/106543 > * config/riscv/riscv.md (sge_): Remove > reference to non-existent operand. > --- > No new failures on the Linux multilibs on trunk. > --- > gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md > index 0796f91dd30..ed1c7f241e6 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md > @@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ > (any_ge:GPR (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand" " r") > (const_int 1)))] > "" > - "slt%i2\t%0,zero,%1" > + "slt\t%0,zero,%1" > [(set_attr "type" "slt") > (set_attr "mode" "")]) > > -- > 2.34.1 >