From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=oEf5=EO=gmail.com=npickito@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2d])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A10B3858D28
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 02:41:24 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4A10B3858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2d.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-48d0bc6a834so1055226e0c.2
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Aug 2023 19:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1693276883; x=1693881683;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=wjRB3Q0/xO7TnzNF61poaCprZBp26Y96wVgHIC0IGzw=;
        b=aFubFDevQNReT6t9PsGx593FnJkwmHH3b1cPUL4KvKsGe29rMAu7fQLtNftYjQuBih
         Yyr6x6iXDzB4v9nVbn/gZf4M04/8RGmDR4v/thfT61I/TNuzF75Za+onunblW19J5+Mo
         OLGMQIoFE3R00cDrKEo5gK6aQOiIjPZ0HklrNp3/4TUQYKItRlH+crxzdlaLr++vtsxt
         +GgRfPx3rr2YKX3M16LRWyPFLTproUhFHgEiTHSfAKijoDB4PcGGXBk34oldJOzDe/a/
         wGCdQyv79askoaI1xUYWvE7PFDeau6v1nJ4r/y0//29gcWUAYKMUPf+dIyfJhXR8oV70
         W/5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1693276883; x=1693881683;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=wjRB3Q0/xO7TnzNF61poaCprZBp26Y96wVgHIC0IGzw=;
        b=Np1EIq1f7T3CHTY7Uk8pq7EkYd06VWQrkT9GENZf1ZBXZnnBf3jCMXj6rm6kaFXvtR
         jwNl0dm70/YXZk5S1ksXta0j23bUG6et0fRAEQ42O0KxvHfjYiL0Kx4bMrnu9xuL7WEv
         O4Nky6mx72dPuO1jocC8966OgsrYQRDfBm11Qiia/5iJr2hP34A1247AxZRZ1qCs5oN/
         Iw58E4PPvC/LJHyGdxdITefo3hoAMmWyjW7Rwz/yX14jt4ky5U2wTVkoNAEe15exSMwK
         sr8oeCYvWnEAoZ7biuhbn9G3m2PWkKmDUgTG86tGfWxaJ4vMBAE9DSa6bIQQ23143lxw
         zoHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyb9Oe3vJLYkmBrVH+jDXLjv2ZWcciZG2fMu05KRSCUkOlJ1T3W
	7gvCx+KQRiXMlzYOgBUY/JSj58ntGxQWg0mKpSA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxfWaa9jivR1oc+/Qqp6or9JufkL6mxbrMW6PJOn+YCFAlHoEpHz/Z1tdYftWsCRqdhoaRkFxhqDCcv1ciZPQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:dac4:0:b0:48f:9585:6fab with SMTP id
 r187-20020a1fdac4000000b0048f95856fabmr16853365vkg.15.1693276883467; Mon, 28
 Aug 2023 19:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230828074759.21049-1-gaofei@eswincomputing.com>
 <CA+yXCZAqvVrw9no19DC_5ceJahQDULbYXHV_FEE0owjZ03PLtA@mail.gmail.com> <2023082818365042600523@eswincomputing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2023082818365042600523@eswincomputing.com>
From: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 10:41:12 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+yXCZC-HsQC1GuYj40+ruD1ArgM0TyWd-D388DsG59s6z0M9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 0/2] support cm.push cm.pop cm.popret in zcmp and
 resolve confilct with shrink-wrap-separate
To: Fei Gao <gaofei@eswincomputing.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, jiawei <jiawei@iscas.ac.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

> 1. flag_shrink_wrap_separate seems better than flag_shrink_wrap.

(flag_)shrink_wrap_separate seems a sub optimization of
(flag_)shrink_wrap, so I am fine if flag_shrink_wrap_separate is
enough.

> 2. to pass the zcmp testcases, i will add fno-shrink-wrap-separate option.

OK