From: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Update multilib-generator to handle V
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:57:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+yXCZCnW789oDQanuYjHyL=5da84XNdXONOqA4hDUDV4m4Ojg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+yXCZCECGjgDQ=CKYUpzc0E75DRO6j7g7FHh6RyBLhApmHXDQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3094 bytes --]
Write a primary version for that, did you mind giving it a try?
The basic idea is to select multilib only by ABI, so that we don't
need to bother with endless multilib reuse cases...
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:38 AM Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, thanks, I know what the problem is, I tried rv64 but didn't try
> rv32, I have another fix in my mind, and will post another fix soon.
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:29 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 18:26:18 PDT (-0700), Kito Cheng wrote:
> > > And which -march -mabi you used will got issue?
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 8:51 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:47:31 PDT (-0700), Kito Cheng wrote:
> > >> > Do you mind shared gcc configure and the option you tried?
> > >>
> > >> Just riscv-gnu-toolchain with "--enbale-multilib --enable-linux".
> > >>
> > >> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 4:01 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 08:44:24 PDT (-0700), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> > >> >> >> Yep, if I drop the non-canonicial strings via
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator b/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator
> > >> >> >> index 58b7198b243..a63a4d69c18 100755
> > >> >> >> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator
> > >> >> >> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator
> > >> >> >> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ for cmodel in cmodels:
> > >> >> >> ext_combs = expand_combination(ext)
> > >> >> >> alts = sum([[x] + [x + y for y in ext_combs] for x in [arch] + extra], [])
> > >> >> >> alts = filter(lambda x: len(x) != 0, alts)
> > >> >> >> - alts = alts + list(map(lambda a : arch_canonicalize(a, args.misa_spec), alts))
> > >> >> >> + alts = list(map(lambda a : arch_canonicalize(a, args.misa_spec), alts))
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> # Drop duplicated entry.
> > >> >> >> alts = unique(alts)
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> then I can't link `-march=rv32imafdcv`, I need
> > >> >> >> `-march=rv32imacv_zicsr_zve32f_zve32x_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b`. That's
> > >> >> >> kind of a headache for users to type in.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Yes, that's a headache for users, but arch string canonicalization is
> > >> >> > hiddened at the process,
> > >> >> > so the user could still just use rv32imafdcv at compile time and
> > >> >> > multi-lib config.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > And the driver and multilib-generator (with arch_canonicalize) script
> > >> >> > will handle those headache in the background.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Sorry, I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to say. I just rebuilt
> > >> >> GCC with this patch (and t-linux-multilib regenerated from it), it's not
> > >> >> resolving multlibs for the short names.
> >
> > `-march=rv32imafdcv` is the broken one,
> > `-march=rv32imacv_zicsr_zve32f_zve32x_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b`
> > resolves multilibs (there's a bit more above).
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-RISC-V-Handle-multi-lib-path-correclty-for-linux-DRA.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6260 bytes --]
From a92c0cb2ce6fa58939331549bfb9e8110ec86a11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:54:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Handle multi-lib path correclty for linux [DRAFT]
---
gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc | 118 ++++++++++++++++--------
gcc/config/riscv/linux.h | 13 ++-
2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
index 2fc0f8bffc1..f40b1b617c2 100644
--- a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
+++ b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
@@ -1597,6 +1597,73 @@ riscv_check_conds (
return match_score + ok_count * 100;
}
+static const char *
+riscv_select_multilib_by_abi (
+ const std::string &riscv_current_arch_str,
+ const std::string &riscv_current_abi_str,
+ const riscv_subset_list *subset_list,
+ const struct switchstr *switches,
+ int n_switches,
+ const std::vector<riscv_multi_lib_info_t> &multilib_infos
+ )
+{
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < multilib_infos.size (); ++i)
+ if (riscv_current_abi_str == multilib_infos[i].abi_str)
+ return xstrdup (multilib_infos[i].path.c_str ());
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+
+static const char *
+riscv_select_multilib (
+ const std::string &riscv_current_arch_str,
+ const std::string &riscv_current_abi_str,
+ const riscv_subset_list *subset_list,
+ const struct switchstr *switches,
+ int n_switches,
+ const std::vector<riscv_multi_lib_info_t> &multilib_infos
+ )
+{
+ int match_score = 0;
+ int max_match_score = 0;
+ int best_match_multi_lib = -1;
+ /* Try to decision which set we should used. */
+ /* We have 3 level decision tree here, ABI, check input arch/ABI must
+ be superset of multi-lib arch, and other rest option checking. */
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < multilib_infos.size (); ++i)
+ {
+ /* Check ABI is same first. */
+ if (riscv_current_abi_str != multilib_infos[i].abi_str)
+ continue;
+
+ /* Found a potential compatible multi-lib setting!
+ Calculate the match score. */
+ match_score = subset_list->match_score (multilib_infos[i].subset_list);
+
+ /* Checking other cond in the multi-lib setting. */
+ match_score = riscv_check_conds (switches,
+ n_switches,
+ match_score,
+ multilib_infos[i].conds);
+
+ /* Record highest match score multi-lib setting. */
+ if (match_score > max_match_score)
+ {
+ best_match_multi_lib = i;
+ max_match_score = match_score;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (best_match_multi_lib == -1)
+ {
+ riscv_no_matched_multi_lib = true;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ else
+ return xstrdup (multilib_infos[best_match_multi_lib].path.c_str ());
+}
+
/* Implement TARGET_COMPUTE_MULTILIB. */
static const char *
riscv_compute_multilib (
@@ -1621,6 +1688,12 @@ riscv_compute_multilib (
std::string option_cond;
riscv_multi_lib_info_t multilib_info;
+ bool check_abi_only = false;
+
+#if TARGET_LINUX == 1
+ check_abi_only = true;
+#endif
+
/* Already found suitable, multi-lib, just use that. */
if (multilib_dir != NULL)
return multilib_dir;
@@ -1672,7 +1745,11 @@ riscv_compute_multilib (
}
this_path_len = p - this_path;
- multilib_info.path = std::string (this_path, this_path_len);
+ const char *multi_os_dir_pos = (const char*)memchr (this_path, ':', this_path_len);
+ if (multi_os_dir_pos)
+ multilib_info.path = std::string (this_path, multi_os_dir_pos - this_path);
+ else
+ multilib_info.path = std::string (this_path, this_path_len);
option_conds.clear ();
/* Pasrse option check list into vector<string>.
@@ -1707,43 +1784,10 @@ riscv_compute_multilib (
p++;
}
- int match_score = 0;
- int max_match_score = 0;
- int best_match_multi_lib = -1;
- /* Try to decision which set we should used. */
- /* We have 3 level decision tree here, ABI, check input arch/ABI must
- be superset of multi-lib arch, and other rest option checking. */
- for (size_t i = 0; i < multilib_infos.size (); ++i)
- {
- /* Check ABI is same first. */
- if (riscv_current_abi_str != multilib_infos[i].abi_str)
- continue;
-
- /* Found a potential compatible multi-lib setting!
- Calculate the match score. */
- match_score = subset_list->match_score (multilib_infos[i].subset_list);
-
- /* Checking other cond in the multi-lib setting. */
- match_score = riscv_check_conds (switches,
- n_switches,
- match_score,
- multilib_infos[i].conds);
-
- /* Record highest match score multi-lib setting. */
- if (match_score > max_match_score)
- {
- best_match_multi_lib = i;
- max_match_score = match_score;
- }
- }
-
- if (best_match_multi_lib == -1)
- {
- riscv_no_matched_multi_lib = true;
- return multilib_dir;
- }
+ if (check_abi_only)
+ return riscv_select_multilib_by_abi (riscv_current_arch_str, riscv_current_abi_str, subset_list, switches, n_switches, multilib_infos);
else
- return xstrdup (multilib_infos[best_match_multi_lib].path.c_str ());
+ return riscv_select_multilib (riscv_current_arch_str, riscv_current_abi_str, subset_list, switches, n_switches, multilib_infos);
}
#undef TARGET_COMPUTE_MULTILIB
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/linux.h b/gcc/config/riscv/linux.h
index b9557a75dc7..46256f78e5d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/linux.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/linux.h
@@ -72,7 +72,12 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#define TARGET_ASM_FILE_END file_end_indicate_exec_stack
#define STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC \
- "/lib" XLEN_SPEC "/" ABI_SPEC "/ " \
- "/usr/lib" XLEN_SPEC "/" ABI_SPEC "/ " \
- "/lib/ " \
- "/usr/lib/ "
+ "%{mabi=lp64d: /lib64/lp64d/ /usr/lib64/lp64d/ /lib/ /usr/lib/}" \
+ "%{mabi=lp64f: /lib64/lp64f/ /usr/lib64/lp64f/ /lib/ /usr/lib/}" \
+ "%{mabi=lp64: /lib64/lp64/ /usr/lib64/lp64/ /lib/ /usr/lib/}" \
+ "%{mabi=ilp32d: /lib32/ilp32d /usr/lib32/ilp32d/ /lib/ /usr/lib/}" \
+ "%{mabi=ilp32f: /lib32/ilp32f/ /usr/lib32/ilp32f/ /lib/ /usr/lib/}" \
+ "%{mabi=ilp32: /lib32/ilp32/ /usr/lib32/ilp32/ /lib/ /usr/lib/}"
+
+#define RISCV_USE_CUSTOMISED_MULTI_LIB 1
+#define TARGET_LINUX 1
--
2.39.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-13 20:52 Palmer Dabbelt
2023-04-14 1:53 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-14 7:15 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-17 15:24 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-04-17 17:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-04-18 15:44 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-18 20:01 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-04-19 0:47 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-19 0:51 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-04-19 1:26 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-19 1:29 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-04-19 1:38 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-19 3:57 ` Kito Cheng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+yXCZCnW789oDQanuYjHyL=5da84XNdXONOqA4hDUDV4m4Ojg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).