From: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
To: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"Kito.cheng" <Kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
jeffreyalaw <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
Robin Dapp <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] RISC-V: Relax the -march string for accept any order
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 17:39:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+yXCZDwsK-J5xhcUtMXjh5zG4YJin4n9Pq4AB3=r2tyrkFqsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1F00CBE174DC9D66+2024011917365533410141@rivai.ai>
Oh, ok, I must have missed something during testing.
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 5:37 PM juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
<juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> Hi, kito.
>
> I found these following regression:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O0 at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O1 at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O3 -g at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -Os at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-27.c -Os (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O0 at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O1 at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O3 -g at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -Os at line 7 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/arch-28.c -Os (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O0 at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O1 at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O3 -g at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -Os at line 8 (test for errors, line )
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/attribute-10.c -Os (test for excess errors)
>
> Could you take a look at it ?
> I am not sure whether they are caused by this patch. But I find only this patch looks related.
> ________________________________
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 9:36 juzhe.zhong
2024-01-19 9:39 ` Kito Cheng [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-08 13:47 Kito Cheng
2024-01-09 18:31 ` Jeff Law
2024-01-10 0:58 ` Kito Cheng
2024-01-10 1:38 ` Fangrui Song
2024-01-16 14:33 ` Jeff Law
2024-01-19 7:20 ` Kito Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+yXCZDwsK-J5xhcUtMXjh5zG4YJin4n9Pq4AB3=r2tyrkFqsA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=Kito.cheng@sifive.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).