From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67381 invoked by alias); 5 May 2015 12:49:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 67345 invoked by uid 89); 5 May 2015 12:49:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp1.ist.utl.pt Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt (HELO smtp1.ist.utl.pt) (193.136.128.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 12:49:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7760C402FA6E for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:49:23 +0100 (WEST) Received: from smtp1.ist.utl.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.ist.utl.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id u07k890qOL-D for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:49:23 +0100 (WEST) Received: from mail2.ist.utl.pt (mail.ist.utl.pt [IPv6:2001:690:2100:1::8]) by smtp1.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBDE402FA85 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:49:23 +0100 (WEST) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) (Authenticated sender: ist162489) by mail2.ist.utl.pt (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F20432003A3D for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 13:49:22 +0100 (WEST) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so144923462wid.0 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.81.104 with SMTP id z8mr3769504wix.5.1430830162633; Tue, 05 May 2015 05:49:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.30.82 with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 05:48:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87y4m2ogvi.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20150408175457.GR2366@two.firstfloor.org> <87iod4npcv.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <87618enteg.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> From: Nuno Diegues Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 12:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] add self-tuning to x86 hardware fast path in libitm To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Andi Kleen , Paolo Romano Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2 Today I have received the news that the Copyright Assignment was completed with the FSF. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Nuno Diegues wrote: > > > Patch looks good to me now. It would be perhaps nice to have an > > environment variable to turn the adaptive algorithm off for tests, > > but that's not critical. > > Yes, that makes perfect sense. > > > > It would be also nice to test it on something else, but I understand > > it's difficult to find other software using the STM syntax. > > Indeed. I'll try to find some time to work on that, but it may take a while. > > > > I can't approve the patch however. I believe it's big enough that you > > may need a copy right assignment. > > I have signed a Form Assignment from the Free Software Foundation to > deal exactly with those matters for this patch to the libitm. Torvald > Riegel had advised me to do so. > > I have not, however, received any further information; so I'm left > wondering if it went through or if it is still hanging. I will ping > back to FSF to check that out perhaps? > > > Best regards, > -- Nuno Diegues > > > > > > > -Andi > > > > -- > > ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only