From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-502040-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 91244 invoked by alias); 31 May 2019 08:39:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 91235 invoked by uid 89); 31 May 2019 08:39:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=H*i:sk:CAFiYyc, H*c:alternative
X-HELO: mail-qt1-f179.google.com
Received: from mail-qt1-f179.google.com (HELO mail-qt1-f179.google.com) (209.85.160.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 May 2019 08:39:30 +0000
Received: by mail-qt1-f179.google.com with SMTP id y57so10435170qtk.4        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 01:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=c07J2hvBU2Py+jdD3/1FsERjJLA7BMjq740wq43yqUg=;        b=GKqt1AWDKbsOBxCuW/5mVHOlBos09U/5/kAlT1oZUrvWPsXe/V2d0lFzoQqSDVQdEU         XGUbTAedD+vX3ZLRSzKJeszEWezRN9zKTOeiEtdeJUUJSGUPYM1aUPAwCo8casSGrHf3         b2QYXXl6NCl/5gfQCHgVgClokalKyy4NyhQgBQDOjRkP3cfkvSuc8xQndvTBNS8J+TAt         GYmbyS9/G5pXmQwV7FhUGDJL/zOpVvNX4FpOzqfRo7OtKxpw+FUNs+O28r3LAur5l6xH         sZvZg1/Fu4X6qxej/YENNJtwG60W6TweM1ZQTUPP5CdMQQJQIuvtIsNBlI+1LnuIw3CW         zp9A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190521145911.3330-1-patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> <CAAXf6LUgy=BU_=B3+Zd_u=p0j9RL4NyThSPLMaxYPR6XxSAbPA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2P-TZVJx3P7e2EYZDnPGupW+imodKT58QdRtTR8T6wjw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2P-TZVJx3P7e2EYZDnPGupW+imodKT58QdRtTR8T6wjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas De Schampheleire <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 08:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAAXf6LXU37VdwuZ_rN=3L=oqWULR1pdSZr14AJp1CT87dg4mQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] debug: make -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols the default [PR debug/86964]
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas De Schampheleire <thomas.de_schampheleire@nokia.com>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg02093.txt.bz2

On Fri, May 31, 2019, 10:23 Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:10 PM Thomas De Schampheleire
> <patrickdepinguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard,
>
> Sorry for the delay - I have bootstrapped/tested the patch and
> installed it on trunk.
> If there will be no complaints I plan to backport it for GCC 9.2 (you
> may need to
> remind me in a few weeks).
>

Thanks.

I think I read somewhere that 7.4 is the last 7.x release, is that correct?

But what about 8.x? If there will be a new release I think these patches
should be backported too, no? After all, it's part of a regression.

In what location can you see such info about which branches and releases
are expected, latest release in a stream, etc?

Best regards
Thomas