From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lhyatt@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8AD393743C
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:12:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id p62so1997820qkb.0
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2020 06:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=TYEoioJvzWqN3G1f/f8myMmDmezY9q62xYiUhd+IR1Q=;
 b=LDI5M2+v+gvy4z8cXaKgPovaUXp9Z/JS6Axq4pou5cu7LTTSjgu6z0uJ9GGbbVA3px
 36hqcQVV56bAvrkWyJSqSUPqURS2QQTKAcSw7LOFz63KrfMq2w31ioiXif3qOYMNNPgb
 z/VH12Y+/vJfVBw40VK5BHNxX++yvBgAj7fhaGnRI8oyIk/ckunTAXwj2zXNa6NJr8+W
 re0/POo/OMq3K86c5QenLtXgWLSCBnZAk4YHcWJXk6/0XqMMevA9Njx+7DqlBiDOA1ih
 +JwCEg+eNwvH4fwThTJkU5BaDGXM0Dqz8raOq2uo9z+HUb99ce748HdA2rMUAXKMgpff
 ejqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0ZbOq0EscBt4/K32oXHW5O3OoN3N0Fe34Z8+9iA/l4D5Ev+BVk
 lFb4Ai8Au2wsrDlf8kxJikxr3est5H62j8pfZl2M1Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vuh70/HlZsGiE+muTPvARym66PQqN64zAUyFiMHNtRqvIg99DMIoAf01HScP8CRFj8xcNTTTniQJq4v+4yl59E=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9b56:: with SMTP id d83mr2551046qke.461.1583932351356; 
 Wed, 11 Mar 2020 06:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA_5UQ4XnHP6d8eg9unOqphrnc1mWuCwfqxZsRgfei2wmHa2tw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LSU.2.21.2003080021260.4184@anthias.pfeifer.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2003080021260.4184@anthias.pfeifer.com>
From: Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:12:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA_5UQ4Jm+ebEa1qaXihKk5fJ-Qa1Y8rmGwBWnEbArkYEhjOyw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] wwwdocs: Document support for extended identifiers
 added to GCC 10
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 13:12:32 -0000

Great, thank you very much for taking a look at it. Sorry if this
email is unnecessary noise, but it wasn't quite clear to me whether
this should also still be approved from a content perspective? I
didn't want to assume. Thanks!

-Lewis

On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 6:23 PM Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2020, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > Just checking whether the below is OK for gcc 10 changes.html please. Thanks!
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg01667.html
>
> Yes, this looks fine to me from a web perspective.
>
> Thank you,
> Gerald