From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823A83858CDA for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:44:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 823A83858CDA Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id e11so9578285ljl.4 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 05:44:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=pKAghu+h45MkCrHKBIfGD/RLcO2oD2U8E+ZrqC+hRu0=; b=uam3rorJ+2+MqlghN/rGmN22OFX+cHP/HsIhbRfVEoUGsNKuRLYviOu9JwuhtemvSg yhSu5v4MUJo7MBzlD3mQHU1wirsh8msuSfAN3RKwBmIQDfqSeQR+eRuxs3nPKwsC5n8o /LECdb0EGRVa5IUiidZ/rK45Mzfmz60X0bBJnq6qyfGiZYoMh4z6waOfLMbj6hNozj19 JkbU99Jo9FhV0w2ISv+pY0nPzVL3IotxyJxGBtQlhh3dwadjragmuFpsgMTCnQK94EVP rV9Kz+FKfJizssnFjWNMSnCb3gMffW28QpP2dlbEWyR32VDY/uddSPNRnf4j4Rt8ui1i kmrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/IqMTRyzbJYJYHHF1Phvkr5ZUPhmnKyMivpb8gzCgIfVgG5MZO xDSWyMdFjV8heSFoL1A0mPwPG8cQX+4Q4IkA1mg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v0i6lRVkkL/oqfDI6RNUv/LQ/50KdbBU4FFQqGz3QmQUQ1wmJrXBtv3I6aG8ZhygOVjrUrEM6oJas0MiWHCFQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:886:b0:25d:64c0:27b1 with SMTP id d6-20020a05651c088600b0025d64c027b1mr3955167ljq.396.1659271469727; Sun, 31 Jul 2022 05:44:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220709205230.GA4991@ldh-imac.local> <377c7016-633c-f354-8c21-599ff2b56449@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Lewis Hyatt Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 08:44:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] c: Fix location for _Pragma tokens [PR97498] To: Jeff Law Cc: gcc-patches List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3030.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 12:44:34 -0000 On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 10:43 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > There was a request to backport this > > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97498#c7) since it is > > relevant to this one: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106267. Is that OK as > > well for any of the current release branches please? It will work fine > > as far back as 10. Thanks... > Generally we try to focus mostly on codegen issues and regressions on > the release branches, but it's not a strict rule. Given this has been > on the trunk for nearly a couple weeks without issues, feel free to go > ahead and backport per Martin's request. > > jeff Thank you, I'll do that. One question, does a backport need to be an exact cherry-pick, or is it OK if I need to tweak a few things as well? I wasn't sure if I need to re-post the patch here in that case. The patch itself applies to gcc 12 branch fine, however I think I need a couple small changes to the testsuite parts. Thanks... -Lewis