public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Ping: [PATCH] libcpp: Fix ICE on directive inside _Pragma() operator [PR67046]
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:53:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA_5UQ7kMj_TwtBvZeXUrw+q5nHpqnsgBVZWOjJZME35kQv-LQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello-

May I please ping this short patch that fixes an old bug? Thanks...

-Lewis

On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 1:46 PM Lewis Hyatt <lhyatt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> get__Pragma_string() in directives.cc is responsible for lexing the parens
> and the string argument from a _Pragma("...") operator. This function does
> not handle the case when the closing paren is not on the same line as the
> string; in that case, libcpp will by default reuse the token buffer it
> previously used for the string, so that the string token returned by
> get__Pragma_string() may be corrupted, as shown in the testcase. Fix using
> the existing keep_tokens mechanism that temporarily disables the reuse of
> token buffers.
>
> libcpp/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR preprocessor/67046
>         * directives.cc (_cpp_do__Pragma): Increment pfile->keep_tokens to
>         ensure the returned string token is valid.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR preprocessor/67046
>         * c-c++-common/cpp/pr67046.c: New test.
> ---
>
> Notes:
>     Hello-
>
>     https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67046
>
>     This fixes an old ICE in libcpp that can happen when lexing the tokens from a
>     _Pragma operator. Bootstrapped+tested on x86-64 Linux with no
>     regressions. Please let me know if it's OK? Thanks...
>
>     -Lewis
>
>  gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr67046.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  libcpp/directives.cc                     |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr67046.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr67046.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr67046.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f37f20c624e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/pr67046.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +/* { dg-do preprocess } */
> +
> +_Pragma(
> +"message(\"msg\")"
> +)
> +
> +_Pragma(
> +"message(\"msg\")"
> +#
> +)
> diff --git a/libcpp/directives.cc b/libcpp/directives.cc
> index 9dc4363c65a..ffd262bce7d 100644
> --- a/libcpp/directives.cc
> +++ b/libcpp/directives.cc
> @@ -1996,7 +1996,12 @@ destringize_and_run (cpp_reader *pfile, const cpp_string *in,
>  int
>  _cpp_do__Pragma (cpp_reader *pfile, location_t expansion_loc)
>  {
> +  /* Make sure we don't invalidate the string token, if the closing parenthesis
> +   ended up on a different line.  */
> +  ++pfile->keep_tokens;
>    const cpp_token *string = get__Pragma_string (pfile);
> +  --pfile->keep_tokens;
> +
>    pfile->directive_result.type = CPP_PADDING;
>
>    if (string)

                 reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA_5UQ7kMj_TwtBvZeXUrw+q5nHpqnsgBVZWOjJZME35kQv-LQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lhyatt@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).