Hi Richard,
Following from off-list discussion, in the attached patch, I wrote pattern
similar to vec_duplicate<mode>_reg, which seems to work for the svld1rq tests.
Does it look OK ?

Sorry, I didn't fully understand your suggestion on integrating with
vec_duplicate<mode>_reg
pattern. For vec_duplicate<mode>_reg, the operand to vec_duplicate expects
mode to be <VEL>, while the pattern in patch expects operand of
vec_duplicate to have mode <V128>.
How do we write a pattern so an operand can accept either of the 2 modes ?
Also it seems <V128> cannot be used with SVE_ALL ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh