public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>
To: yanzhang.wang@intel.com
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Support simplify (-1-x) for vector.
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 01:25:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAgBjMkoKJcPCsaqkWoXY2F7r3S90DJsJgFL6GRGRfNhHziFSQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816084038.2725233-1-yanzhang.wang@intel.com>

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 14:12, yanzhang.wang--- via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> From: Yanzhang Wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>
>
> The pattern is enabled for scalar but not for vector. The patch try to
> make it consistent and will convert below code,
(CCing Richard S.)
Hi,
Sorry if this comment is not relevant to the patch but I was wondering if it
should also fold -1 - x --> ~x for the following test or is the test
written incorrectly ?

svint32_t f(svint32_t x)
{
  return svsub_s32_x (svptrue_b8 (), svdup_s32 (-1), x);
}

expand dump shows:
(insn 2 4 3 2 (set (reg/v:VNx4SI 93 [ x ])
        (reg:VNx4SI 32 v0 [ x ])) "foo.c":9:1 -1
     (nil))
(note 3 2 6 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
(insn 6 3 7 2 (set (reg:VNx4SI 94)
        (const_vector:VNx4SI repeat [
                (const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff])
            ])) "foo.c":10:10 -1
     (nil))
(insn 7 6 11 2 (set (reg:VNx4SI 92 [ <retval> ])
        (minus:VNx4SI (reg:VNx4SI 94)
            (reg/v:VNx4SI 93 [ x ]))) "foo.c":10:10 -1
     (nil))
(insn 11 7 12 2 (set (reg/i:VNx4SI 32 v0)
        (reg:VNx4SI 92 [ <retval> ])) "foo.c":11:1 -1
     (nil))
(insn 12 11 0 2 (use (reg/i:VNx4SI 32 v0)) "foo.c":11:1 -1
     (nil))

and results in following code-gen:
f:
        mov     z31.b, #-1
        sub     z0.s, z31.s, z0.s
        ret

Altho I suppose at TREE level the above call to svsub_s32_x could be folded by
implementing the same transform (-1 - x -> ~x) in svsub_impl::fold ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh




>
> shortcut_for_riscv_vrsub_case_1_32:
>         vl1re32.v       v1,0(a1)
>         vsetvli zero,a2,e32,m1,ta,ma
>         vrsub.vi        v1,v1,-1
>         vs1r.v  v1,0(a0)
>         ret
>
> to,
>
> shortcut_for_riscv_vrsub_case_1_32:
>         vl1re32.v       v1,0(a1)
>         vsetvli zero,a2,e32,m1,ta,ma
>         vnot.v  v1,v1
>         vs1r.v  v1,0(a0)
>         ret
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * simplify-rtx.cc (simplify_context::simplify_binary_operation_1):
>     Get -1 with mode.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/simplify-vrsub.c: New test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanzhang Wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>
> ---
>  gcc/simplify-rtx.cc                            |  2 +-
>  .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/simplify-vrsub.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/simplify-vrsub.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
> index d7315d82aa3..eb1ac120832 100644
> --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
> +++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc
> @@ -3071,7 +3071,7 @@ simplify_context::simplify_binary_operation_1 (rtx_code code,
>        /* (-1 - a) is ~a, unless the expression contains symbolic
>          constants, in which case not retaining additions and
>          subtractions could cause invalid assembly to be produced.  */
> -      if (trueop0 == constm1_rtx
> +      if (trueop0 == CONSTM1_RTX (mode)
>           && !contains_symbolic_reference_p (op1))
>         return simplify_gen_unary (NOT, mode, op1, mode);
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/simplify-vrsub.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/simplify-vrsub.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..df87ed94ea4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/simplify-vrsub.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64 -O3 -Wno-psabi" } */
> +
> +#include "riscv_vector.h"
> +
> +#define VRSUB_WITH_LMUL(LMUL, DTYPE)                        \
> +  vint##DTYPE##m##LMUL##_t                                  \
> +  shortcut_for_riscv_vrsub_case_##LMUL##_##DTYPE            \
> +  (vint##DTYPE##m##LMUL##_t v1,                             \
> +   size_t vl)                                               \
> +  {                                                         \
> +    return __riscv_vrsub_vx_i##DTYPE##m##LMUL (v1, -1, vl); \
> +  }
> +
> +VRSUB_WITH_LMUL (1, 16)
> +VRSUB_WITH_LMUL (1, 32)
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vnot\.v} 2 } } */
> --
> 2.41.0
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-21 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16  8:40 yanzhang.wang
2023-08-17  4:32 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-17  6:31   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-08-21 19:55 ` Prathamesh Kulkarni [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAgBjMkoKJcPCsaqkWoXY2F7r3S90DJsJgFL6GRGRfNhHziFSQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=yanzhang.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).