[6/9] sparc changes to adjust vec_perm_const hook

[Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 328 bytes --]

Hi,
The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter.
For rationale, please see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595128.html

Unfortunately, I am not sure how to cross test this patch.
make all-gcc stage-1 seems to build fine.
Is it OK to commit the patch ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh

[-- Attachment #2: vec-perm-const-1-sparc.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1286 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.cc b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.cc
index aca925befe1..7e08e86422a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.cc
@@ -712,8 +712,8 @@ static bool sparc_modes_tieable_p (machine_mode, machine_mode);
 static bool sparc_can_change_mode_class (machine_mode, machine_mode,
 					 reg_class_t);
 static HOST_WIDE_INT sparc_constant_alignment (const_tree, HOST_WIDE_INT);
-static bool sparc_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode, rtx, rtx, rtx,
-					    const vec_perm_indices &);
+static bool sparc_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode, machine_mode, rtx, rtx,
+					    rtx, const vec_perm_indices &);
 static bool sparc_can_follow_jump (const rtx_insn *, const rtx_insn *);
 static HARD_REG_SET sparc_zero_call_used_regs (HARD_REG_SET);
 \f
@@ -13035,9 +13035,13 @@ sparc_expand_vec_perm_bmask (machine_mode vmode, rtx sel)
 /* Implement TARGET_VEC_PERM_CONST.  */
 
 static bool
-sparc_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0,
-				rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel)
+sparc_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode,
+				rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1,
+				const vec_perm_indices &sel)
 {
+  if (vmode != op_mode)
+    return false;
+
   if (!TARGET_VIS2)
     return false;