From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22255 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2013 16:02:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 22235 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2013 16:02:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ea0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:02:33 +0000 Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id h11so296581eaa.34 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:02:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.177.1 with SMTP id c1mr192573443eem.8.1357833752299; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:02:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.129.195 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:02:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k3rlrrkw.fsf@redhat.com> References: <877gnnwzdg.fsf@redhat.com> <87hamqtlum.fsf@redhat.com> <87k3rlrrkw.fsf@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/55663 - constexpr function templ instantiation considered non-const as alias templ arg From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Dodji Seketeli Cc: GCC Patches , Jason Merrill Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote: > > Also, I am not sure if this patch would be appropriate for commit, now > that we are in 'regression-only' mode. But seeing this alias-template > related thing not working hurts me. :) So at worst I'll schedule the > patch for when stage1 opens again. It is certainly a blocker for some people here using both constexpr and template alias. (The code uses a technique documented in the upcoming 4th edition of TC++PL which is due anytime now. It would be embarrassing if GCC-4.8 didn't accept it.) -- Gaby