From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-305683-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2286 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2011 15:26:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 2224 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Oct 2011 15:26:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:26:02 +0000
Received: by faas16 with SMTP id s16so3178673faa.20        for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.61.211 with SMTP id u19mr67377023fah.29.1319729160567; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.152.2.71 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1C1CA683-5EE9-457C-A99F-EED09D4EF71E@gmail.com>
References: <4EA93A2E.9010400@oracle.com>	<CAAiZkiDcO6+-ykw90F88eYiLJum0S6bAE1d5NDD1FzioVi_yeg@mail.gmail.com>	<7317B19F-C1A7-4EB6-99FB-03FAD154E28A@oracle.com>	<CAAiZkiBUK_oDa1LOMGrmzje=Uuy2Ka1fz6Am-W5wHGDqzibtQA@mail.gmail.com>	<1C1CA683-5EE9-457C-A99F-EED09D4EF71E@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:43:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAAiZkiDgGW88jOc3O1bqYAiR-ziWWLiaj8fx_V1YNqewg+CZ-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v3] Fix libstdc++/50880
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg02481.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I am surprised by your comment. =A0You do not care and that is why you
>> are eager to
>> commit the patch without checking first with fellow area maintainers?
>
> Yes, probably my comment wan't clear enough: my point was that I cannot s=
pend more time on this issue. I'm convinced, I may be wrong, that the curre=
nt code is better than it was 6 hours ago, if I disagree, please revert it,=
 do whatever you like, really, I will take no offense.
>

I fully appreciate you can't spend more time than you have.  That is hardly=
 an
excuse to willy-nilly applying a patch without checking with fellow maintai=
ners
in special area under the pretense that you don't care and if they
don't agree they
just revert the patch.  that way lies madness and chaos.