* Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
@ 2014-08-06 10:05 Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-13 8:14 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-29 17:41 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-08-06 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, jakub
Hi,
The issue was firstly observed on NDK gcc since TLS is not supported
in Android bionic. I also see the same failure on gcc configured for
linux with –disable-tls, libgomp make check log:
FAIL: libgomp.c/affinity-1.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/icv-2.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/lock-3.c execution test
FAIL: libgomp.c/target-6.c execution test
These tests except affinity-1.c fail because gomp_thread () function
returns null pointer. I’ve found 2 bugs, first one addresses this
problem on Windows:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616;
second one addresses original problem (for both cases, with and without TLS):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36242.
Tests from both bugs fail with –disable-tls. So, it seems that non TLS
case was fixed just partially. The following patch solves the problem.
With this patch 3 tests from make check pass, affinity-1.c fails, but
I think it’s other non TLS problem.
Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
2014-08-06 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
* libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
* team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
---
diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
@@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
}
#else
extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
+extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
{
- return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr == NULL)
+ {
+ thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
+ }
+ return thr;
}
#endif
diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
index e6a6d8f..bf8bd4b 100644
--- a/libgomp/team.c
+++ b/libgomp/team.c
@@ -927,6 +927,17 @@ initialize_team (void)
gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
}
+#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
+{
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
+ gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
+
+ return thr;
+}
+#endif
+
static void __attribute__((destructor))
team_destructor (void)
{
---
Is it ok?
Best regards,
Varvara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-08-06 10:05 Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616) Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-08-13 8:14 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-29 11:21 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-29 17:41 ` Richard Henderson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-08-13 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, jakub
*Ping*
Thanks,
Varvara
2014-08-06 14:05 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> The issue was firstly observed on NDK gcc since TLS is not supported
> in Android bionic. I also see the same failure on gcc configured for
> linux with –disable-tls, libgomp make check log:
>
> FAIL: libgomp.c/affinity-1.c execution test
> FAIL: libgomp.c/icv-2.c execution test
> FAIL: libgomp.c/lock-3.c execution test
> FAIL: libgomp.c/target-6.c execution test
>
> These tests except affinity-1.c fail because gomp_thread () function
> returns null pointer. I’ve found 2 bugs, first one addresses this
> problem on Windows:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616;
> second one addresses original problem (for both cases, with and without TLS):
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36242.
> Tests from both bugs fail with –disable-tls. So, it seems that non TLS
> case was fixed just partially. The following patch solves the problem.
> With this patch 3 tests from make check pass, affinity-1.c fails, but
> I think it’s other non TLS problem.
> Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
>
>
> 2014-08-06 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>
> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
> * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> }
> #else
> extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
> static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> {
> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + if (thr == NULL)
> + {
> + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
> + }
> + return thr;
> }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
> index e6a6d8f..bf8bd4b 100644
> --- a/libgomp/team.c
> +++ b/libgomp/team.c
> @@ -927,6 +927,17 @@ initialize_team (void)
> gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
> }
>
> +#ifndef HAVE_TLS
> +struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
> +{
> + struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
> + gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
> +
> + return thr;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static void __attribute__((destructor))
> team_destructor (void)
> {
> ---
>
>
> Is it ok?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Varvara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-08-13 8:14 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-08-29 11:21 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-08-29 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, jakub
Hi again! I want to remind that issue is urgent for Android.
2014-08-13 12:13 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> *Ping*
>
> Thanks,
> Varvara
>
> 2014-08-06 14:05 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The issue was firstly observed on NDK gcc since TLS is not supported
>> in Android bionic. I also see the same failure on gcc configured for
>> linux with –disable-tls, libgomp make check log:
>>
>> FAIL: libgomp.c/affinity-1.c execution test
>> FAIL: libgomp.c/icv-2.c execution test
>> FAIL: libgomp.c/lock-3.c execution test
>> FAIL: libgomp.c/target-6.c execution test
>>
>> These tests except affinity-1.c fail because gomp_thread () function
>> returns null pointer. I’ve found 2 bugs, first one addresses this
>> problem on Windows:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616;
>> second one addresses original problem (for both cases, with and without TLS):
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36242.
>> Tests from both bugs fail with –disable-tls. So, it seems that non TLS
>> case was fixed just partially. The following patch solves the problem.
>> With this patch 3 tests from make check pass, affinity-1.c fails, but
>> I think it’s other non TLS problem.
>> Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-06 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>>
>> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>> * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
>> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> }
>> #else
>> extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>> +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>> static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> {
>> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + if (thr == NULL)
>> + {
>> + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>> + }
>> + return thr;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
>> index e6a6d8f..bf8bd4b 100644
>> --- a/libgomp/team.c
>> +++ b/libgomp/team.c
>> @@ -927,6 +927,17 @@ initialize_team (void)
>> gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
>> }
>>
>> +#ifndef HAVE_TLS
>> +struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
>> +{
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
>> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
>> + gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
>> +
>> + return thr;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static void __attribute__((destructor))
>> team_destructor (void)
>> {
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Is it ok?
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Varvara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-08-06 10:05 Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616) Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-13 8:14 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-08-29 17:41 ` Richard Henderson
2014-09-01 10:38 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-01 10:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
1 sibling, 2 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2014-08-29 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik, gcc-patches, jakub
On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
> * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> }
> #else
> extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
> static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> {
> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + if (thr == NULL)
> + {
> + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
> + }
> + return thr;
> }
This should never happen.
The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
those functions?
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-08-29 17:41 ` Richard Henderson
@ 2014-09-01 10:38 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-01 10:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
1 sibling, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-09-01 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: gcc-patches, jakub
I've checked several tests, I see that for all tests failure occurs in
function gomp_icv (). E.g.:
icv-2:
#0 gomp_icv (write=true) at ../../../libgomp/libgomp.h:494
#1 omp_set_num_threads (n=6) at ../../../libgomp/env.c:1282
#2 0x0000000000404014 in tf ()
#3 0x000000000040d063 in start_thread ()
#4 0x0000000000450139 in clone ()
lock-3:
#0 gomp_icv (write=true) at ../../../libgomp/libgomp.h:494
#1 omp_test_nest_lock (lock=0x6dd580 <lock>) at
../../../libgomp/config/linux/lock.c:109
#2 0x0000000000403fbc in tf ()
#3 0x000000000040ccd3 in start_thread ()
#4 0x000000000044fda9 in clone ()
2014-08-29 21:40 GMT+04:00 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>:
> On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>> * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
>> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> }
>> #else
>> extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>> +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>> static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> {
>> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + if (thr == NULL)
>> + {
>> + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>> + }
>> + return thr;
>> }
>
> This should never happen.
>
> The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
>
> Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
> those functions?
>
>
> r~
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-08-29 17:41 ` Richard Henderson
2014-09-01 10:38 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-09-01 10:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-09-02 10:37 ` Varvara Rainchik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2014-09-01 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: Varvara Rainchik, gcc-patches
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> > * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
> > * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
> >
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> > index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
> > --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
> > +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> > @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> > }
> > #else
> > extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> > +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
> > static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> > {
> > - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> > + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> > + if (thr == NULL)
> > + {
> > + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
> > + }
> > + return thr;
> > }
>
> This should never happen.
I guess it can happen if you mix up explicit pthread_create and libgomp APIs.
initialize_team will only initialize it in the initial thread, while if you
use #pragma omp ... or omp_* calls from a thread created with
pthread_create, in the !HAVE_TLS case pthread_getspecific will return NULL.
Now, the patch doesn't handle that case completely though (and is badly
formatted), the problem is that if we allocate in the !HAVE_TLS case
in non-initial thread the TLS data, we want to free them again, so that
would mean pthread_key_create with non-NULL destructor, and then we need to
differentiate in between the 3 cases - key equal to &initial_thread_tls_data
(would need to move out of the block context), no freeing needed, thread
created by gomp_thread_start, no freeing needed, otherwise free.
> The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
>
> Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
> those functions?
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-01 10:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2014-09-02 10:37 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-19 11:42 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-09-02 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
May I use gomp_free_thread as a destructor for pthread_key_create?
Then I'll make initial_thread_tls_data global for the first case, but
how can I differentiate thread created by gomp_thread_start (second
case)?
2014-09-01 14:51 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>> > * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>> > * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>> >
>> >
>> > ---
>> > diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> > index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
>> > --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> > +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> > @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> > }
>> > #else
>> > extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>> > +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>> > static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> > {
>> > - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> > + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> > + if (thr == NULL)
>> > + {
>> > + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>> > + }
>> > + return thr;
>> > }
>>
>> This should never happen.
>
> I guess it can happen if you mix up explicit pthread_create and libgomp APIs.
> initialize_team will only initialize it in the initial thread, while if you
> use #pragma omp ... or omp_* calls from a thread created with
> pthread_create, in the !HAVE_TLS case pthread_getspecific will return NULL.
>
> Now, the patch doesn't handle that case completely though (and is badly
> formatted), the problem is that if we allocate in the !HAVE_TLS case
> in non-initial thread the TLS data, we want to free them again, so that
> would mean pthread_key_create with non-NULL destructor, and then we need to
> differentiate in between the 3 cases - key equal to &initial_thread_tls_data
> (would need to move out of the block context), no freeing needed, thread
> created by gomp_thread_start, no freeing needed, otherwise free.
>
>> The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
>>
>> Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
>> those functions?
>
> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-02 10:37 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-09-19 11:42 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-24 10:19 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-09-19 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
I've corrected my patch accordingly to what you said. To diffirentiate
second case in destructor I've added pthread_setspecific
(gomp_tls_key, NULL) at the end of gomp_thread_start. So, destructor
can simply skip the case when pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key)
returns 0. I also think that it's better to set 0 in gomp_thread_start
explicitly as thread data is initialized by a local variable in this
function.
But, I see that pthread_getspecific always returns 0 in destrucor
because data pointer is implicitly set to 0 before destructor call in
glibc:
(pthread_create.c):
/* Always clear the data. */
level2[inner].data = NULL;
/* Make sure the data corresponds to a valid
key. This test fails if the key was
deallocated and also if it was
re-allocated. It is the user's
responsibility to free the memory in this
case. */
if (level2[inner].seq
== __pthread_keys[idx].seq
/* It is not necessary to register a destructor
function. */
&& __pthread_keys[idx].destr != NULL)
/* Call the user-provided destructor. */
__pthread_keys[idx].destr (data);
I suppose it's not necessary if everything is cleaned up in
gomp_thread_start and destructor. What do you think?
Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
* libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
* team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
---
diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
index bcd5b34..2f33d99 100644
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
@@ -467,9 +467,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
}
#else
extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
-static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
+extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
+static struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
{
- return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr == NULL)
+ {
+ thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
+ }
+ return thr;
}
#endif
diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
index e6a6d8f..a692df8 100644
--- a/libgomp/team.c
+++ b/libgomp/team.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
__thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
#else
pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
+struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
#endif
@@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
gomp_sem_destroy (&thr->release);
thr->thread_pool = NULL;
thr->task = NULL;
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
return NULL;
}
@@ -222,8 +224,16 @@ gomp_free_pool_helper (void *thread_pool)
void
gomp_free_thread (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
{
- struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_thread ();
- struct gomp_thread_pool *pool = thr->thread_pool;
+ struct gomp_thread *thr;
+ struct gomp_thread_pool *pool;
+#ifdef HAVE_TLS
+ thr = gomp_thread ();
+#else
+ thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr == NULL)
+ return;
+#endif
+ pool = thr->thread_pool;
if (pool)
{
if (pool->threads_used > 0)
@@ -910,6 +920,21 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
}
}
+/* Destructor for data created in create_non_tls_thread_data. */
+
+#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+void
+non_tls_thread_data_destructor (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
+{
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr != NULL && thr != &initial_thread_tls_data)
+ {
+ gomp_free_thread (arg);
+ free (thr);
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
+ }
+}
+#endif
/* Constructors for this file. */
@@ -917,9 +942,7 @@ static void __attribute__((constructor))
initialize_team (void)
{
#ifndef HAVE_TLS
- static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
-
- pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
+ pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, non_tls_thread_data_destructor);
pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, &initial_thread_tls_data);
#endif
@@ -927,6 +950,19 @@ initialize_team (void)
gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
}
+/* Create data for thread created by pthread_create. */
+
+#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
+{
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc_cleared (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
+ gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
+
+ return thr;
+}
+#endif
+
static void __attribute__((destructor))
team_destructor (void)
{
2014-09-02 14:36 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> May I use gomp_free_thread as a destructor for pthread_key_create?
> Then I'll make initial_thread_tls_data global for the first case, but
> how can I differentiate thread created by gomp_thread_start (second
> case)?
>
> 2014-09-01 14:51 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>>> > * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>>> > * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ---
>>> > diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>> > index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
>>> > --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>> > +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>> > @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>>> > }
>>> > #else
>>> > extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>>> > +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>>> > static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>>> > {
>>> > - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>>> > + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>>> > + if (thr == NULL)
>>> > + {
>>> > + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>>> > + }
>>> > + return thr;
>>> > }
>>>
>>> This should never happen.
>>
>> I guess it can happen if you mix up explicit pthread_create and libgomp APIs.
>> initialize_team will only initialize it in the initial thread, while if you
>> use #pragma omp ... or omp_* calls from a thread created with
>> pthread_create, in the !HAVE_TLS case pthread_getspecific will return NULL.
>>
>> Now, the patch doesn't handle that case completely though (and is badly
>> formatted), the problem is that if we allocate in the !HAVE_TLS case
>> in non-initial thread the TLS data, we want to free them again, so that
>> would mean pthread_key_create with non-NULL destructor, and then we need to
>> differentiate in between the 3 cases - key equal to &initial_thread_tls_data
>> (would need to move out of the block context), no freeing needed, thread
>> created by gomp_thread_start, no freeing needed, otherwise free.
>>
>>> The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
>>>
>>> Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
>>> those functions?
>>
>> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-19 11:42 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-09-24 10:19 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-30 7:03 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-09-24 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
*Ping*
2014-09-19 15:41 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> I've corrected my patch accordingly to what you said. To diffirentiate
> second case in destructor I've added pthread_setspecific
> (gomp_tls_key, NULL) at the end of gomp_thread_start. So, destructor
> can simply skip the case when pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key)
> returns 0. I also think that it's better to set 0 in gomp_thread_start
> explicitly as thread data is initialized by a local variable in this
> function.
>
> But, I see that pthread_getspecific always returns 0 in destrucor
> because data pointer is implicitly set to 0 before destructor call in
> glibc:
>
> (pthread_create.c):
>
> /* Always clear the data. */
> level2[inner].data = NULL;
>
> /* Make sure the data corresponds to a valid
> key. This test fails if the key was
> deallocated and also if it was
> re-allocated. It is the user's
> responsibility to free the memory in this
> case. */
> if (level2[inner].seq
> == __pthread_keys[idx].seq
> /* It is not necessary to register a destructor
> function. */
> && __pthread_keys[idx].destr != NULL)
> /* Call the user-provided destructor. */
> __pthread_keys[idx].destr (data);
>
> I suppose it's not necessary if everything is cleaned up in
> gomp_thread_start and destructor. What do you think?
>
>
> Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
>
> 2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>
> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
> * team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
> create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> index bcd5b34..2f33d99 100644
> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> @@ -467,9 +467,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> }
> #else
> extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> -static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
> +static struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> {
> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + if (thr == NULL)
> + {
> + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
> + }
> + return thr;
> }
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
> index e6a6d8f..a692df8 100644
> --- a/libgomp/team.c
> +++ b/libgomp/team.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
> __thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
> #else
> pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> +struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
> #endif
>
>
> @@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
> gomp_sem_destroy (&thr->release);
> thr->thread_pool = NULL;
> thr->task = NULL;
> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -222,8 +224,16 @@ gomp_free_pool_helper (void *thread_pool)
> void
> gomp_free_thread (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
> {
> - struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_thread ();
> - struct gomp_thread_pool *pool = thr->thread_pool;
> + struct gomp_thread *thr;
> + struct gomp_thread_pool *pool;
> +#ifdef HAVE_TLS
> + thr = gomp_thread ();
> +#else
> + thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + if (thr == NULL)
> + return;
> +#endif
> + pool = thr->thread_pool;
> if (pool)
> {
> if (pool->threads_used > 0)
> @@ -910,6 +920,21 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Destructor for data created in create_non_tls_thread_data. */
> +
> +#ifndef HAVE_TLS
> +void
> +non_tls_thread_data_destructor (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
> +{
> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> + if (thr != NULL && thr != &initial_thread_tls_data)
> + {
> + gomp_free_thread (arg);
> + free (thr);
> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
> + }
> +}
> +#endif
>
> /* Constructors for this file. */
>
> @@ -917,9 +942,7 @@ static void __attribute__((constructor))
> initialize_team (void)
> {
> #ifndef HAVE_TLS
> - static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
> -
> - pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
> + pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, non_tls_thread_data_destructor);
> pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, &initial_thread_tls_data);
> #endif
>
> @@ -927,6 +950,19 @@ initialize_team (void)
> gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
> }
>
> +/* Create data for thread created by pthread_create. */
> +
> +#ifndef HAVE_TLS
> +struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
> +{
> + struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc_cleared (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
> + gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
> +
> + return thr;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static void __attribute__((destructor))
> team_destructor (void)
> {
>
> 2014-09-02 14:36 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>> May I use gomp_free_thread as a destructor for pthread_key_create?
>> Then I'll make initial_thread_tls_data global for the first case, but
>> how can I differentiate thread created by gomp_thread_start (second
>> case)?
>>
>> 2014-09-01 14:51 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>> On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>>>> > * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>>>> > * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ---
>>>> > diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>>> > index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
>>>> > --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>>> > +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>>> > @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>>>> > }
>>>> > #else
>>>> > extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>>>> > +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>>>> > static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>>>> > {
>>>> > - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>>>> > + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>>>> > + if (thr == NULL)
>>>> > + {
>>>> > + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>>>> > + }
>>>> > + return thr;
>>>> > }
>>>>
>>>> This should never happen.
>>>
>>> I guess it can happen if you mix up explicit pthread_create and libgomp APIs.
>>> initialize_team will only initialize it in the initial thread, while if you
>>> use #pragma omp ... or omp_* calls from a thread created with
>>> pthread_create, in the !HAVE_TLS case pthread_getspecific will return NULL.
>>>
>>> Now, the patch doesn't handle that case completely though (and is badly
>>> formatted), the problem is that if we allocate in the !HAVE_TLS case
>>> in non-initial thread the TLS data, we want to free them again, so that
>>> would mean pthread_key_create with non-NULL destructor, and then we need to
>>> differentiate in between the 3 cases - key equal to &initial_thread_tls_data
>>> (would need to move out of the block context), no freeing needed, thread
>>> created by gomp_thread_start, no freeing needed, otherwise free.
>>>
>>>> The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
>>>>
>>>> Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
>>>> those functions?
>>>
>>> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-24 10:19 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-09-30 7:03 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-30 9:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-09-30 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
* libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
* team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
---
diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
index bcd5b34..2f33d99 100644
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
@@ -467,9 +467,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
}
#else
extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
-static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
+extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
+static struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
{
- return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr == NULL)
+ {
+ thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
+ }
+ return thr;
}
#endif
diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
index e6a6d8f..1854d8a 100644
--- a/libgomp/team.c
+++ b/libgomp/team.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
__thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
#else
pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
+struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
#endif
@@ -130,6 +131,9 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
gomp_sem_destroy (&thr->release);
thr->thread_pool = NULL;
thr->task = NULL;
+#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
+#endif
return NULL;
}
@@ -222,8 +226,16 @@ gomp_free_pool_helper (void *thread_pool)
void
gomp_free_thread (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
{
- struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_thread ();
- struct gomp_thread_pool *pool = thr->thread_pool;
+ struct gomp_thread *thr;
+ struct gomp_thread_pool *pool;
+#ifdef HAVE_TLS
+ thr = gomp_thread ();
+#else
+ thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr == NULL)
+ return;
+#endif
+ pool = thr->thread_pool;
if (pool)
{
if (pool->threads_used > 0)
@@ -910,6 +922,21 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
}
}
+/* Destructor for data created in create_non_tls_thread_data. */
+
+#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+void
+non_tls_thread_data_destructor (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
+{
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
+ if (thr != NULL && thr != &initial_thread_tls_data)
+ {
+ gomp_free_thread (arg);
+ free (thr);
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
+ }
+}
+#endif
/* Constructors for this file. */
@@ -917,9 +944,7 @@ static void __attribute__((constructor))
initialize_team (void)
{
#ifndef HAVE_TLS
- static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
-
- pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
+ pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, non_tls_thread_data_destructor);
pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, &initial_thread_tls_data);
#endif
@@ -927,6 +952,19 @@ initialize_team (void)
gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
}
+/* Create data for thread created by pthread_create. */
+
+#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
+{
+ struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc_cleared (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
+ pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
+ gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
+
+ return thr;
+}
+#endif
+
static void __attribute__((destructor))
team_destructor (void)
{
2014-09-24 14:19 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> *Ping*
>
> 2014-09-19 15:41 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>> I've corrected my patch accordingly to what you said. To diffirentiate
>> second case in destructor I've added pthread_setspecific
>> (gomp_tls_key, NULL) at the end of gomp_thread_start. So, destructor
>> can simply skip the case when pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key)
>> returns 0. I also think that it's better to set 0 in gomp_thread_start
>> explicitly as thread data is initialized by a local variable in this
>> function.
>>
>> But, I see that pthread_getspecific always returns 0 in destrucor
>> because data pointer is implicitly set to 0 before destructor call in
>> glibc:
>>
>> (pthread_create.c):
>>
>> /* Always clear the data. */
>> level2[inner].data = NULL;
>>
>> /* Make sure the data corresponds to a valid
>> key. This test fails if the key was
>> deallocated and also if it was
>> re-allocated. It is the user's
>> responsibility to free the memory in this
>> case. */
>> if (level2[inner].seq
>> == __pthread_keys[idx].seq
>> /* It is not necessary to register a destructor
>> function. */
>> && __pthread_keys[idx].destr != NULL)
>> /* Call the user-provided destructor. */
>> __pthread_keys[idx].destr (data);
>>
>> I suppose it's not necessary if everything is cleaned up in
>> gomp_thread_start and destructor. What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux.
>>
>> 2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>>
>> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>> * team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
>> create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> index bcd5b34..2f33d99 100644
>> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>> @@ -467,9 +467,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> }
>> #else
>> extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>> -static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>> +static struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>> {
>> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + if (thr == NULL)
>> + {
>> + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>> + }
>> + return thr;
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
>> index e6a6d8f..a692df8 100644
>> --- a/libgomp/team.c
>> +++ b/libgomp/team.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
>> __thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
>> #else
>> pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>> +struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
>> #endif
>>
>>
>> @@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
>> gomp_sem_destroy (&thr->release);
>> thr->thread_pool = NULL;
>> thr->task = NULL;
>> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -222,8 +224,16 @@ gomp_free_pool_helper (void *thread_pool)
>> void
>> gomp_free_thread (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
>> {
>> - struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_thread ();
>> - struct gomp_thread_pool *pool = thr->thread_pool;
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr;
>> + struct gomp_thread_pool *pool;
>> +#ifdef HAVE_TLS
>> + thr = gomp_thread ();
>> +#else
>> + thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + if (thr == NULL)
>> + return;
>> +#endif
>> + pool = thr->thread_pool;
>> if (pool)
>> {
>> if (pool->threads_used > 0)
>> @@ -910,6 +920,21 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +/* Destructor for data created in create_non_tls_thread_data. */
>> +
>> +#ifndef HAVE_TLS
>> +void
>> +non_tls_thread_data_destructor (void *arg __attribute__((unused)))
>> +{
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>> + if (thr != NULL && thr != &initial_thread_tls_data)
>> + {
>> + gomp_free_thread (arg);
>> + free (thr);
>> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +#endif
>>
>> /* Constructors for this file. */
>>
>> @@ -917,9 +942,7 @@ static void __attribute__((constructor))
>> initialize_team (void)
>> {
>> #ifndef HAVE_TLS
>> - static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
>> -
>> - pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
>> + pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, non_tls_thread_data_destructor);
>> pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, &initial_thread_tls_data);
>> #endif
>>
>> @@ -927,6 +950,19 @@ initialize_team (void)
>> gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
>> }
>>
>> +/* Create data for thread created by pthread_create. */
>> +
>> +#ifndef HAVE_TLS
>> +struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void)
>> +{
>> + struct gomp_thread *thr = gomp_malloc_cleared (sizeof (struct gomp_thread));
>> + pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
>> + gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
>> +
>> + return thr;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static void __attribute__((destructor))
>> team_destructor (void)
>> {
>>
>> 2014-09-02 14:36 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>>> May I use gomp_free_thread as a destructor for pthread_key_create?
>>> Then I'll make initial_thread_tls_data global for the first case, but
>>> how can I differentiate thread created by gomp_thread_start (second
>>> case)?
>>>
>>> 2014-09-01 14:51 GMT+04:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:40:57AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>>>> On 08/06/2014 03:05 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>>>>> > * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>>>>> > * team.c (create_non_tls_thread_data): New function.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---
>>>>> > diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>>>> > index a1482cc..cf3ec8f 100644
>>>>> > --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>>>> > +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
>>>>> > @@ -479,9 +479,15 @@ static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>>>>> > }
>>>>> > #else
>>>>> > extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
>>>>> > +extern struct gomp_thread *create_non_tls_thread_data (void);
>>>>> > static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
>>>>> > {
>>>>> > - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>>>>> > + struct gomp_thread *thr = pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
>>>>> > + if (thr == NULL)
>>>>> > + {
>>>>> > + thr = create_non_tls_thread_data ();
>>>>> > + }
>>>>> > + return thr;
>>>>> > }
>>>>>
>>>>> This should never happen.
>>>>
>>>> I guess it can happen if you mix up explicit pthread_create and libgomp APIs.
>>>> initialize_team will only initialize it in the initial thread, while if you
>>>> use #pragma omp ... or omp_* calls from a thread created with
>>>> pthread_create, in the !HAVE_TLS case pthread_getspecific will return NULL.
>>>>
>>>> Now, the patch doesn't handle that case completely though (and is badly
>>>> formatted), the problem is that if we allocate in the !HAVE_TLS case
>>>> in non-initial thread the TLS data, we want to free them again, so that
>>>> would mean pthread_key_create with non-NULL destructor, and then we need to
>>>> differentiate in between the 3 cases - key equal to &initial_thread_tls_data
>>>> (would need to move out of the block context), no freeing needed, thread
>>>> created by gomp_thread_start, no freeing needed, otherwise free.
>>>>
>>>>> The thread-specific data is set in gomp_thread_start and initialize_team.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where are you getting a call to gomp_thread that hasn't been through one of
>>>>> those functions?
>>>>
>>>> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-30 7:03 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-09-30 9:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-09-30 14:40 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2014-09-30 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:03:47AM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
> gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
>
> 2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>
> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
> * team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
> create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
I actually wonder when we have emutls support in libgcc if it wouldn't
be better to just define HAVE_TLS always to 1 (i.e. remove all the
conditionals on it), then you wouldn't need to bother with this at all.
I don't have an OS which doesn't support native TLS though, so somebody with
such a system would need to test it and benchmark if it doesn't make things
slower.
Richard, thoughts on this?
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-30 9:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2014-09-30 14:40 ` Richard Henderson
2014-10-01 16:45 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2014-09-30 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek, Varvara Rainchik; +Cc: gcc-patches
On 09/30/2014 02:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:03:47AM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>> Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
>> gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
>>
>> 2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>>
>> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>> * team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
>> create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
>
> I actually wonder when we have emutls support in libgcc if it wouldn't
> be better to just define HAVE_TLS always to 1 (i.e. remove all the
> conditionals on it), then you wouldn't need to bother with this at all.
>
> I don't have an OS which doesn't support native TLS though, so somebody with
> such a system would need to test it and benchmark if it doesn't make things
> slower.
>
> Richard, thoughts on this?
I like that idea better as well.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-09-30 14:40 ` Richard Henderson
@ 2014-10-01 16:45 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-10-07 7:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-10-01 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Henderson; +Cc: Jakub Jelinek, gcc-patches
Ok, then here it is a new patch (tested and bootstrapped on linux).
On linux with --disable-tls now all libgomp make check tests pass; for
Android I've patched toolchain and tried test from one of the
mentioned bugs, test passes too.
Is there some benchmark to check performance?
2014-10-01 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
* libgomp.h (HAVE_TLS): Set to 1.
--
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
# pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
#endif
+#define HAVE_TLS 1
+
/* If we were a C++ library, we'd get this from <std/atomic>. */
enum memmodel
{
2014-09-30 18:40 GMT+04:00 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>:
> On 09/30/2014 02:52 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:03:47AM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>>> Corrected patch: call pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, NULL) in
>>> gomp_thread_start if HAVE_TLS is not defined.
>>>
>>> 2014-09-19 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>>>
>>> * libgomp.h (gomp_thread): For non TLS case create thread data.
>>> * team.c (non_tls_thread_data_destructor,
>>> create_non_tls_thread_data): New functions.
>>
>> I actually wonder when we have emutls support in libgcc if it wouldn't
>> be better to just define HAVE_TLS always to 1 (i.e. remove all the
>> conditionals on it), then you wouldn't need to bother with this at all.
>>
>> I don't have an OS which doesn't support native TLS though, so somebody with
>> such a system would need to test it and benchmark if it doesn't make things
>> slower.
>>
>> Richard, thoughts on this?
>
> I like that idea better as well.
>
>
> r~
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-10-01 16:45 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-10-07 7:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-13 10:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2014-10-07 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:44:59PM +0400, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> Ok, then here it is a new patch (tested and bootstrapped on linux).
>
> On linux with --disable-tls now all libgomp make check tests pass; for
> Android I've patched toolchain and tried test from one of the
> mentioned bugs, test passes too.
> Is there some benchmark to check performance?
There is SPEC OMP,
http://www.spec.org/hpg/omp2001/
EPCC,
http://www2.epcc.ed.ac.uk/computing/research_activities/openmpbench/openmp_index.html
NAS,
http://www.nas.nasa.gov/publications/npb.html
http://phase.hpcc.jp/Omni/benchmarks/NPB/
Rodinia,
https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~skadron/wiki/rodinia/index.php/Main_Page
Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
actually fail? Can you figure that out?
If we get rid of HAVE_TLS code altogether, we might lose support of
some very old OSes, e.g. some Linux distros with a recent gcc and binutils
(so that emutls isn't used), but very old glibc (that doesn't support
TLS or supports it incorrectly, think of pre-2002 glibc). So, if we get
rid of !HAVE_TLS code in libgomp, it would be nice if config/tls.m4 detected
it properly and we'd just fail at configure time.
And if we don't, just make sure that on Android, Darwin and/or M$Win (or
whatever other OS you had in mind which does support pthreads, but doesn't
support native TLS) find out why HAVE_AS_TLS is not defined (guess
config.log should explain that).
> 2014-10-01 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>
> * libgomp.h (HAVE_TLS): Set to 1.
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-10-07 7:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2014-10-13 10:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-11-10 13:32 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-10-13 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
> Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
> actually fail? Can you figure that out?
>
On Android check passes with --disable-tls (standard while building
gcc for Android as TLS is not supported in bionic) and fails with
--enable-tls (i686-linux-android/libgomp/conftest.c:32: undefined
reference to `___tls_get_addr'). So, HAVE_TLS is not defined in both
cases.
> If we get rid of HAVE_TLS code altogether, we might lose support of
> some very old OSes, e.g. some Linux distros with a recent gcc and binutils
> (so that emutls isn't used), but very old glibc (that doesn't support
> TLS or supports it incorrectly, think of pre-2002 glibc). So, if we get
> rid of !HAVE_TLS code in libgomp, it would be nice if config/tls.m4 detected
> it properly and we'd just fail at configure time.
How can we check this in config/tls.m4? Can we just combine tests on
TLS and emutls? E.g. check whether HAVE_TLS and USE_EMUTLS are both
defined.
> And if we don't, just make sure that on Android, Darwin and/or M$Win (or
> whatever other OS you had in mind which does support pthreads, but doesn't
> support native TLS) find out why HAVE_AS_TLS is not defined (guess
> config.log should explain that).
HAVE_AS_TLS is also not defined for Android as it depends on --enable-tls.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-10-13 10:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-11-10 13:32 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-01 15:25 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-11-10 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
*Ping*
2014-10-13 14:48 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>> Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
>> actually fail? Can you figure that out?
>>
>
> On Android check passes with --disable-tls (standard while building
> gcc for Android as TLS is not supported in bionic) and fails with
> --enable-tls (i686-linux-android/libgomp/conftest.c:32: undefined
> reference to `___tls_get_addr'). So, HAVE_TLS is not defined in both
> cases.
>
>> If we get rid of HAVE_TLS code altogether, we might lose support of
>> some very old OSes, e.g. some Linux distros with a recent gcc and binutils
>> (so that emutls isn't used), but very old glibc (that doesn't support
>> TLS or supports it incorrectly, think of pre-2002 glibc). So, if we get
>> rid of !HAVE_TLS code in libgomp, it would be nice if config/tls.m4 detected
>> it properly and we'd just fail at configure time.
>
> How can we check this in config/tls.m4? Can we just combine tests on
> TLS and emutls? E.g. check whether HAVE_TLS and USE_EMUTLS are both
> defined.
>
>> And if we don't, just make sure that on Android, Darwin and/or M$Win (or
>> whatever other OS you had in mind which does support pthreads, but doesn't
>> support native TLS) find out why HAVE_AS_TLS is not defined (guess
>> config.log should explain that).
>
> HAVE_AS_TLS is also not defined for Android as it depends on --enable-tls.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-11-10 13:32 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-12-01 15:25 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-08 13:30 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-12-01 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
Hi Jakub,
Do you think this patch is ok for upstream:
2014-12-01 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
* libgomp/libgomp.h: Eliminate case when HAVE_TLS is not defined:
always use tls emulation.
* libgomp/team.c: Likewise.
--
diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
index a1482cc..a659ebc 100644
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
@@ -471,19 +471,11 @@ enum gomp_cancel_kind
/* ... and here is that TLS data. */
-#ifdef HAVE_TLS
extern __thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
{
return &gomp_tls_data;
}
-#else
-extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
-static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
-{
- return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
-}
-#endif
extern struct gomp_task_icv *gomp_new_icv (void);
diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
index e6a6d8f..2e8dc47 100644
--- a/libgomp/team.c
+++ b/libgomp/team.c
@@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
/* This is the libgomp per-thread data structure. */
-#ifdef HAVE_TLS
__thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
-#else
-pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
-#endif
-
/* This structure is used to communicate across pthread_create. */
@@ -70,13 +65,7 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
void (*local_fn) (void *);
void *local_data;
-#ifdef HAVE_TLS
thr = &gomp_tls_data;
-#else
- struct gomp_thread local_thr;
- thr = &local_thr;
- pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
-#endif
gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
/* Extract what we need from data. */
@@ -916,13 +905,6 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
static void __attribute__((constructor))
initialize_team (void)
{
-#ifndef HAVE_TLS
- static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
-
- pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
- pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, &initial_thread_tls_data);
-#endif
-
if (pthread_key_create (&gomp_thread_destructor, gomp_free_thread) != 0)
gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
}
Or should I add some extra checks in config/tls.m4? As far as I
understand you have mentioned case when both native tls and tls
emulation are not supported. So, is it sufficient to check that
HAVE_TLS and USE_EMUTLS are not defined to detect this case?
2014-11-10 16:15 GMT+03:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> *Ping*
>
> 2014-10-13 14:48 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>>> Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
>>> actually fail? Can you figure that out?
>>>
>>
>> On Android check passes with --disable-tls (standard while building
>> gcc for Android as TLS is not supported in bionic) and fails with
>> --enable-tls (i686-linux-android/libgomp/conftest.c:32: undefined
>> reference to `___tls_get_addr'). So, HAVE_TLS is not defined in both
>> cases.
>>
>>> If we get rid of HAVE_TLS code altogether, we might lose support of
>>> some very old OSes, e.g. some Linux distros with a recent gcc and binutils
>>> (so that emutls isn't used), but very old glibc (that doesn't support
>>> TLS or supports it incorrectly, think of pre-2002 glibc). So, if we get
>>> rid of !HAVE_TLS code in libgomp, it would be nice if config/tls.m4 detected
>>> it properly and we'd just fail at configure time.
>>
>> How can we check this in config/tls.m4? Can we just combine tests on
>> TLS and emutls? E.g. check whether HAVE_TLS and USE_EMUTLS are both
>> defined.
>>
>>> And if we don't, just make sure that on Android, Darwin and/or M$Win (or
>>> whatever other OS you had in mind which does support pthreads, but doesn't
>>> support native TLS) find out why HAVE_AS_TLS is not defined (guess
>>> config.log should explain that).
>>
>> HAVE_AS_TLS is also not defined for Android as it depends on --enable-tls.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-01 15:25 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-12-08 13:30 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-08 14:03 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-12-08 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
Hi guys,
Could you please take a look at this issue? This fix is still urgent
for Android.
2014-12-01 18:25 GMT+03:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Do you think this patch is ok for upstream:
>
> 2014-12-01 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>
> * libgomp/libgomp.h: Eliminate case when HAVE_TLS is not defined:
> always use tls emulation.
> * libgomp/team.c: Likewise.
>
> --
> diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> index a1482cc..a659ebc 100644
> --- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
> +++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
> @@ -471,19 +471,11 @@ enum gomp_cancel_kind
>
> /* ... and here is that TLS data. */
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_TLS
> extern __thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
> static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> {
> return &gomp_tls_data;
> }
> -#else
> -extern pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> -static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
> -{
> - return pthread_getspecific (gomp_tls_key);
> -}
> -#endif
>
> extern struct gomp_task_icv *gomp_new_icv (void);
>
> diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
> index e6a6d8f..2e8dc47 100644
> --- a/libgomp/team.c
> +++ b/libgomp/team.c
> @@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
>
>
> /* This is the libgomp per-thread data structure. */
> -#ifdef HAVE_TLS
> __thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
> -#else
> -pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
> -#endif
> -
>
> /* This structure is used to communicate across pthread_create. */
>
> @@ -70,13 +65,7 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
> void (*local_fn) (void *);
> void *local_data;
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_TLS
> thr = &gomp_tls_data;
> -#else
> - struct gomp_thread local_thr;
> - thr = &local_thr;
> - pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, thr);
> -#endif
> gomp_sem_init (&thr->release, 0);
>
> /* Extract what we need from data. */
> @@ -916,13 +905,6 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
> static void __attribute__((constructor))
> initialize_team (void)
> {
> -#ifndef HAVE_TLS
> - static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
> -
> - pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
> - pthread_setspecific (gomp_tls_key, &initial_thread_tls_data);
> -#endif
> -
> if (pthread_key_create (&gomp_thread_destructor, gomp_free_thread) != 0)
> gomp_fatal ("could not create thread pool destructor.");
> }
>
> Or should I add some extra checks in config/tls.m4? As far as I
> understand you have mentioned case when both native tls and tls
> emulation are not supported. So, is it sufficient to check that
> HAVE_TLS and USE_EMUTLS are not defined to detect this case?
>
> 2014-11-10 16:15 GMT+03:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>> *Ping*
>>
>> 2014-10-13 14:48 GMT+04:00 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.s.rainchik@gmail.com>:
>>>> Now, I wonder on which OS and why does config/tls.m4 CHECK_GCC_TLS
>>>> actually fail? Can you figure that out?
>>>>
>>>
>>> On Android check passes with --disable-tls (standard while building
>>> gcc for Android as TLS is not supported in bionic) and fails with
>>> --enable-tls (i686-linux-android/libgomp/conftest.c:32: undefined
>>> reference to `___tls_get_addr'). So, HAVE_TLS is not defined in both
>>> cases.
>>>
>>>> If we get rid of HAVE_TLS code altogether, we might lose support of
>>>> some very old OSes, e.g. some Linux distros with a recent gcc and binutils
>>>> (so that emutls isn't used), but very old glibc (that doesn't support
>>>> TLS or supports it incorrectly, think of pre-2002 glibc). So, if we get
>>>> rid of !HAVE_TLS code in libgomp, it would be nice if config/tls.m4 detected
>>>> it properly and we'd just fail at configure time.
>>>
>>> How can we check this in config/tls.m4? Can we just combine tests on
>>> TLS and emutls? E.g. check whether HAVE_TLS and USE_EMUTLS are both
>>> defined.
>>>
>>>> And if we don't, just make sure that on Android, Darwin and/or M$Win (or
>>>> whatever other OS you had in mind which does support pthreads, but doesn't
>>>> support native TLS) find out why HAVE_AS_TLS is not defined (guess
>>>> config.log should explain that).
>>>
>>> HAVE_AS_TLS is also not defined for Android as it depends on --enable-tls.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-08 13:30 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-12-08 14:03 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-08 16:01 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2014-12-08 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:30:46PM +0300, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Could you please take a look at this issue? This fix is still urgent
> for Android.
I'm afraid it will break those targets where emutls is not on, but the C
library doesn't support TLS. I think it is acceptable not to care about
#pragma omp from different pthread_create created threads in that case, but
stopping support completely might be too early.
So, can you instead arrange for HAVE_TLS to be defined if emutls is
supported (check for that during configure)?
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-08 14:03 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2014-12-08 16:01 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-08 16:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-12-08 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
Is it ok to add GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS test in libgomp/configure.ac or
should I add in tls.m3 a similair test that would be used only in
libgomp?
2014-12-08 17:03 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 04:30:46PM +0300, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Could you please take a look at this issue? This fix is still urgent
>> for Android.
>
> I'm afraid it will break those targets where emutls is not on, but the C
> library doesn't support TLS. I think it is acceptable not to care about
> #pragma omp from different pthread_create created threads in that case, but
> stopping support completely might be too early.
> So, can you instead arrange for HAVE_TLS to be defined if emutls is
> supported (check for that during configure)?
>
> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-08 16:01 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-12-08 16:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-09 11:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2014-12-08 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:01:09PM +0300, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> Is it ok to add GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS test in libgomp/configure.ac or
> should I add in tls.m3 a similair test that would be used only in
> libgomp?
I think config/tls.m4 would be a better place, but doing it in some way
where the users of config/tls.m4 could actually by using different macros
from there choose what they want (either check solely for real TLS, or
only for emutls, or for both). And libgomp/configure.ac would then choose
it is happy with both.
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-08 16:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2014-12-09 11:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-09 12:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-12-09 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
Can we instead of adding new macroses in config/tls.m4 use something
like that in libgomp:
#if defined (HAVE_TLS) && defined (USE_EMUTLS)
(with GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS in libgomp/configure.ac)?
2014-12-08 19:28 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:01:09PM +0300, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>> Is it ok to add GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS test in libgomp/configure.ac or
>> should I add in tls.m3 a similair test that would be used only in
>> libgomp?
>
> I think config/tls.m4 would be a better place, but doing it in some way
> where the users of config/tls.m4 could actually by using different macros
> from there choose what they want (either check solely for real TLS, or
> only for emutls, or for both). And libgomp/configure.ac would then choose
> it is happy with both.
>
> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-09 11:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-12-09 12:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-09 14:53 ` Varvara Rainchik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2014-12-09 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:49:44PM +0300, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> Can we instead of adding new macroses in config/tls.m4 use something
> like that in libgomp:
>
> #if defined (HAVE_TLS) && defined (USE_EMUTLS)
>
> (with GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS in libgomp/configure.ac)?
That would be fine too.
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-09 12:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2014-12-09 14:53 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-09 16:37 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Varvara Rainchik @ 2014-12-09 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Richard Henderson, gcc-patches
Ok, the following patch works for Android:
2014-12-09 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
* config.h.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* configure.ac: Add GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS.
* libgomp.h: Add check for USE_EMUTLS: this case
is equal to HAVE_TLS.
* team.c: Likewise.
--
diff --git a/libgomp/configure.ac b/libgomp/configure.ac
index cea6366..16ec158 100644
--- a/libgomp/configure.ac
+++ b/libgomp/configure.ac
@@ -245,6 +245,9 @@ fi
# See if we support thread-local storage.
GCC_CHECK_TLS
+# See if we have emulated thread-local storage.
+GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS
+
# See what sort of export controls are available.
LIBGOMP_CHECK_ATTRIBUTE_VISIBILITY
LIBGOMP_CHECK_ATTRIBUTE_DLLEXPORT
diff --git a/libgomp/libgomp.h b/libgomp/libgomp.h
index a1482cc..b694356 100644
--- a/libgomp/libgomp.h
+++ b/libgomp/libgomp.h
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ enum gomp_cancel_kind
/* ... and here is that TLS data. */
-#ifdef HAVE_TLS
+#if defined HAVE_TLS || defined USE_EMUTLS
extern __thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
static inline struct gomp_thread *gomp_thread (void)
{
diff --git a/libgomp/team.c b/libgomp/team.c
index e6a6d8f..594127c 100644
--- a/libgomp/team.c
+++ b/libgomp/team.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ pthread_key_t gomp_thread_destructor;
/* This is the libgomp per-thread data structure. */
-#ifdef HAVE_TLS
+#if defined HAVE_TLS || defined USE_EMUTLS
__thread struct gomp_thread gomp_tls_data;
#else
pthread_key_t gomp_tls_key;
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ gomp_thread_start (void *xdata)
void (*local_fn) (void *);
void *local_data;
-#ifdef HAVE_TLS
+#if defined HAVE_TLS || defined USE_EMUTLS
thr = &gomp_tls_data;
#else
struct gomp_thread local_thr;
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ gomp_team_end (void)
static void __attribute__((constructor))
initialize_team (void)
{
-#ifndef HAVE_TLS
+#if !defined HAVE_TLS && !defined USE_EMUTLS
static struct gomp_thread initial_thread_tls_data;
pthread_key_create (&gomp_tls_key, NULL);
Changes are bootstrapped and regtested on linux, all make check tests
now also pass with --disable-tls.
Is it ok for upstream?
2014-12-09 15:12 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 02:49:44PM +0300, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
>> Can we instead of adding new macroses in config/tls.m4 use something
>> like that in libgomp:
>>
>> #if defined (HAVE_TLS) && defined (USE_EMUTLS)
>>
>> (with GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS in libgomp/configure.ac)?
>
> That would be fine too.
>
> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616)
2014-12-09 14:53 ` Varvara Rainchik
@ 2014-12-09 16:37 ` Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2014-12-09 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varvara Rainchik, Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc-patches
On 12/09/2014 06:53 AM, Varvara Rainchik wrote:
> 2014-12-09 Varvara Rainchik <varvara.rainchik@intel.com>
>
> * config.h.in: Regenerate.
> * configure: Regenerate.
> * configure.ac: Add GCC_CHECK_EMUTLS.
> * libgomp.h: Add check for USE_EMUTLS: this case
> is equal to HAVE_TLS.
> * team.c: Likewise.
Ok.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-09 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-06 10:05 Fix libgomp crash without TLS (PR42616) Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-13 8:14 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-29 11:21 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-08-29 17:41 ` Richard Henderson
2014-09-01 10:38 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-01 10:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-09-02 10:37 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-19 11:42 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-24 10:19 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-30 7:03 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-09-30 9:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-09-30 14:40 ` Richard Henderson
2014-10-01 16:45 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-10-07 7:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-10-13 10:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-11-10 13:32 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-01 15:25 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-08 13:30 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-08 14:03 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-08 16:01 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-08 16:28 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-09 11:49 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-09 12:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-12-09 14:53 ` Varvara Rainchik
2014-12-09 16:37 ` Richard Henderson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).