Hi, We noticed that one of our benchmarks sped-up by ~1% when we eliminated PLT stubs for some of the hot external library functions like memcmp, pow. The win was from better icache and itlb performance. The main reason was that the PLT stubs had no spatial locality with the call-sites. I have started looking at ways to tell the compiler to eliminate PLT stubs (in-effect inline them) for specified external functions, for x86_64. I have a proposal and a patch and I would like to hear what you think. Here is a summary of what is happening currently. A call to an external function is direct but calls into the PLT stub which then jumps indirectly to the GOT entry. If I could replace the direct call to the PLT stub with an indirect call to a GOT entry which will hold the address of the external function, I have gotten rid of the PLT stub. Here is an example: foo.cc ===== extern int foo (); // Truly external library function, defined in a shared library. int main() { foo(); ... } Currently, this is what is happening. foo.s looks like this: main: ..... callq _Z3foov but the linker replaces this to call the PLT stub of foo instead. Function main calls the plt stub directly: 0000000000400766
: …. 40076a: e8 71 fe ff ff callq 4005e0 <_Z3foov@plt> and the PLT stub does this: 00000000004005e0 <_Z3foov@plt>: 4005e0: jmpq *0x15d2(%rip) # 401bb8 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x28> 4005e6: pushq $0x2 4005eb: jmpq 4005b0 <_init+0x28> The GOT entry at address 0x401bb8 contains the address of foo which will be lazily bound. What my proposal plans does is to change foo.s to look like this: callq *_Z3foov@GOTPCREL(%rip) which is indirectly calling foo via a GOT entry that contains the address of foo. The address in the GOT entry is fixed up at load time and the linker creates only one GOT entry per function irrespective of the number of callers. a.out now looks like this: 0000000000400746
: ... 40074a: ff 15 20 14 00 00 callq *0x1420(%rip) # 401b70 <_DYNAMIC+0x1e8> ... Function main indirectly calls foo using the contents at location 0x401b70 which is actually a GOT entry containing the address of foo. Notice that we have in effect inlined the PLT stub. This comes with caveats. This cannot be generally done for all functions marked extern as it is impossible for the compiler to say if a function is "truly extern" (defined in a shared library). If a function is not truly extern(ends up defined in the final executable), then calling it indirectly is a performance penalty as it could have been a direct call. Further, the newly created GOT entries are fixed up at start-up and do not get lazily bound. Given this, I propose adding a new option called -fno-plt= to the compiler. This tells the compiler that we know that the function is truly extern and we want the indirect call only for these call-sites. I have attached a patch that adds -fno-plt= to GCC. Any number of "-fno-plt=" can be specified and all call-sites corresponding to these named functions will be done indirectly using the mechanism described above without the use of a PLT stub. Alternatively, we can do this entirely in the linker. We can introduce a new relocation type to tell the linker to convert all direct calls to truly extern functions into indirect calls via GOT entries. The GCC patch just seems simpler. Also, we could link statically but we do not want that or we could copy the specific external functions into our executable. This might work for executable A but a different set of external functions might be hot for executable B. We want a more general solution. Please let me know what you think. Thanks Sri