public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,
	David Li <davidxl@google.com>,
		GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH][X86_64] Eliminate PLT stubs for specified external functions via -fno-plt=
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAs8HmzRQ2PtOXyV3_5XBr2ASPqZUnnDj4xEX8OqhuPB3L4HxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpsMtTL-muZpND3DiS60bLXsCVgeTW6sF4a0DHmNE83+g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:01 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:05 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:42 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsriram@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I have attached a patch that adds the new attribute "noplt".  Please review.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * config/i386/i386.c (avoid_plt_to_call): New function.
>>>>>> (ix86_output_call_insn): Generate indirect call for functions
>>>>>> marked with "noplt" attribute.
>>>>>> (attribute_spec ix86_attribute_): Define new attribute "noplt".
>>>>>> * doc/extend.texi: Document new attribute "noplt".
>>>>>> * gcc.target/i386/noplt-1.c: New testcase.
>>>>>> * gcc.target/i386/noplt-2.c: New testcase.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2 comments:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Don't remove "%!" prefix before call/jmp.  It is needed for MPX.
>>>>> 2. Don't you need to check
>>>>>
>>>>>       && !TARGET_MACHO
>>>>>       && !TARGET_SEH
>>>>>       && !TARGET_PECOFF
>>>>>
>>>>> since it only works for ELF.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I will make this change. OTOH, is it just better to piggy-back on
>>>> existing -fno-plt change by Alex in calls.c
>>>> and do this:
>>>>
>>>> Index: calls.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- calls.c (revision 223720)
>>>> +++ calls.c (working copy)
>>>> @@ -226,9 +226,11 @@ prepare_call_address (tree fndecl_or_type, rtx fun
>>>>         && targetm.small_register_classes_for_mode_p (FUNCTION_MODE))
>>>>        ? force_not_mem (memory_address (FUNCTION_MODE, funexp))
>>>>        : memory_address (FUNCTION_MODE, funexp));
>>>> -  else if (flag_pic && !flag_plt && fndecl_or_type
>>>> +  else if (fndecl_or_type
>>>>     && TREE_CODE (fndecl_or_type) == FUNCTION_DECL
>>>> -   && !targetm.binds_local_p (fndecl_or_type))
>>>> +   && !targetm.binds_local_p (fndecl_or_type)
>>>> +   && ((flag_pic && !flag_plt)
>>>> +       || (lookup_attribute ("noplt", DECL_ATTRIBUTES(fndecl_or_type)))))
>>>>      {
>>>>        funexp = force_reg (Pmode, funexp);
>>>>      }
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does it work on non-PIC calls?
>>
>> You are right, it doesnt work.  I have attached the patch with the
>> changes you mentioned.
>>
>
> Since direct_p is true, do wee need
>
> +  if (GET_CODE (call_op) != SYMBOL_REF
> +      || SYMBOL_REF_LOCAL_P (call_op))
> +    return false;

We do need it right because  for this case below, I do not want an
indirect call:

__attribute__((noplt))
int foo() {
  return 0;
}

int main()
{
  return foo();
}

Assuming foo is not inlined, if I remove the lines you mentioned, I
will get an indirect call which is unnecessary.

Thanks
Sri

>
> H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-28 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-10 15:19 H.J. Lu
     [not found] ` <CAAs8HmwWSDY+KjKcB4W=TiYV0Pz7NSvfL_8igp+hPT-LU1utTg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-21 21:31   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-21 21:39     ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-21 22:02     ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-21 22:02       ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-05-22  1:47         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-22  3:38         ` Xinliang David Li
2015-05-21 22:34       ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-22  9:22         ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-22 15:13           ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-28 18:53           ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-28 19:05             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-28 19:48               ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-28 20:19                 ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-28 21:27                   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-28 21:31                     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-28 21:52                       ` Sriraman Tallam [this message]
2015-05-28 22:48                         ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-29  3:51                           ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-29  5:13                             ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-29  7:13                               ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-29 17:36                                 ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-29 17:52                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-29 18:33                                     ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-29 20:50                                 ` Jan Hubicka
2015-05-29 22:56                                   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-29 23:08                                     ` Sriraman Tallam
     [not found]                                     ` <CAJA7tRYsMiq7rx34c=z6KwRdwYxxaeP6Z6qzA4XEwnJSMT7z=Q@mail.gmail.com>
2015-05-30  4:44                                       ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-01  8:24                                         ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-01 18:01                                           ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-01 18:41                                             ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-01 18:55                                               ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-01 20:33                                                 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-02 18:27                                                   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-02 19:59                                                     ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-06-02 20:09                                                       ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-02 21:18                                                         ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-06-02 21:09                                                     ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-02 21:25                                                       ` Xinliang David Li
2015-06-02 21:52                                                         ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2015-06-02 21:40                                                       ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-03 14:37                                                         ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2015-06-03 18:53                                                           ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-03 20:16                                                             ` Richard Henderson
2015-06-03 20:59                                                               ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-04 16:56                                                                 ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-06-04 17:30                                                                   ` Richard Henderson
2015-06-04 21:34                                                                     ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-07-24 19:02                                                                   ` H.J. Lu
2015-06-03 19:57                                                       ` Richard Henderson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-01  0:31 Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-01  3:21 ` Alan Modra
2015-05-01  3:26   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-01 15:01 ` Andi Kleen
2015-05-01 16:19   ` Xinliang David Li
2015-05-01 16:23     ` H.J. Lu
2015-05-01 16:26       ` Xinliang David Li
2015-05-01 18:06         ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-02 12:12           ` Andi Kleen
2015-05-01 17:50   ` Sriraman Tallam
2015-05-04 14:45 ` Michael Matz
2015-05-04 16:43   ` Xinliang David Li
2015-05-04 16:58     ` Michael Matz
2015-05-04 17:22       ` Xinliang David Li
2015-05-09 16:35   ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAs8HmzRQ2PtOXyV3_5XBr2ASPqZUnnDj4xEX8OqhuPB3L4HxA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tmsriram@google.com \
    --cc=davidxl@google.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).