From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129868 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2019 22:25:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129551 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2019 22:25:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:bernde, berndedlingerhotmailde, U*bernd.edlinger, bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de X-HELO: mail-qt1-f172.google.com Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com (HELO mail-qt1-f172.google.com) (209.85.160.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:25:45 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 2so21012027qtb.5 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:25:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190209181835.GS2135@tucnak> In-Reply-To: From: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Avoid the -D option which is not available install-sh To: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Jakub Jelinek , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg01529.txt.bz2 On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 13:58, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > On 2/9/19 7:21 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > On 2/9/19 7:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 06:11:00PM +0000, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > >>> --- libphobos/libdruntime/Makefile.am (revision 268614) > >>> +++ libphobos/libdruntime/Makefile.am (working copy) > >>> @@ -140,10 +140,12 @@ clean-local: > >>> # Handles generated files as well > >>> install-data-local: > >>> for file in $(ALL_DRUNTIME_INSTALL_DSOURCES); do \ > >>> + $(MKDIR_P) `echo $(DESTDIR)$(gdc_include_dir)/$$file \ > >>> + | sed -e 's:/[^/]*$$::'` ; \ > >> > >> Perhaps better `dirname $(DESTDIR)$(gdc_include_dir)/$$file` ? > >> > > > > Ah, yes, good point. > > > > Consider it changed. > > > > > > So here is the latest version with the requested change. > Looks ok to me. > How is the procedure with libpobos patches? > Can we check them into the gcc svn, or will Ian have to > push them first into the upstream? > See libphobos/README.gcc regarding what sources are part of upstream. Anything else that isn't listed is local to gcc svn, and can be committed directly. -- Iain