From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107747 invoked by alias); 13 May 2017 01:40:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 107726 invoked by uid 89); 13 May 2017 01:40:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:621 X-HELO: mail-lf0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f53.google.com) (209.85.215.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 May 2017 01:40:12 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id h4so9150899lfj.3 for ; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:40:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rz5Gturd+FksIt/oDsgtTn7FRUMbVIuNfZ6FHXp0b9Y=; b=E7+Jw4OamCr1AuzMP52RWeQcEh+leiBgLRisb+orvOna6dQn9vvu90dru1RQI09jpS TZiIN9kCGH4u85g1z8HlseI511j0juYWjot4h+LEi/8AYAFHOZQ1wYW2BhbgqO7xBPYF RAK0UlJfgWzVWUVsZQp3tDpJqZdoMlcpzCWk2UzIIp7oeBvSXzR1/7hMTX1FTUl+hFNR XjHutbNM4tU7KzW9dAefffNN1U+zi4tu3nfsi0tPW1iM5W174OshAZO1GRx3BpGNTmKH iQl1OLhHb51/aDKAYcw4+KL4GrZlwakhePPudFyjr2ICMiRfuLb6QUO2myPXp18sn2/w OFfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCiIMN9tb84Vpibrnzu40gfWx+1wYI5I77CRKA3u0/sV1YM+9GW 3YqY05C2vXH27jIe0tsgUNqg3Q0B1fwv X-Received: by 10.25.195.21 with SMTP id t21mr2463558lff.103.1494639613397; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:40:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.214.2 with HTTP; Fri, 12 May 2017 18:40:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jim Wilson Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 02:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] handling address mode changes inside extract_bit_field To: Jeff Law Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg01081.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 03/01/2017 03:06 PM, Jim Wilson wrote: > This seems fine to me. A testcase to add to the gcc.target testsuite would > be useful, but I don't think it's strictly necessary. Thanks for the review. It was 2 months since I posted it, so I retested it to make sure x86_64 and aarch64 bootstrap and make check still worked, then checked it in. That took me a while as I was busy with other stuff this week. The comment about a testcase is a good point; I will work on one to submit. Jim