From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396548-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32283 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2015 19:33:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32268 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2015 19:33:48 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vn0-f43.google.com
Received: from mail-vn0-f43.google.com (HELO mail-vn0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:33:48 +0000
Received: by vnbf62 with SMTP id f62so8490567vnb.13        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;        bh=sHFgWSP1zu3kaz37e0Jvb3wdaJh9/xgyIzYDzU+nlS8=;        b=ZhAUDIOYuxsMjSVQlwbIRtIW2zoY/do19DfFk04+fJeThl4ZKFD4cvruZ015DOTlyB         mpwaNTljw530yUt2UgfCFale480Rkg3kBt+vm8twiiOc2u3iGUOkSCPzq1HO7ivaQXE3         yMCROH6uDtzUAd5qRu3CILLE2y0fu9Wj1quF/0xe+rN3/uwKWHov5Szi73EF5BsirTr9         gdMB96rHiOYytmp1PufM+6q1KBEsL+SgXI2fCMr62/crQtcpoHq10Vs5nMNIoZ8w9hxu         8xozO2RDwWHzQvOxa5dT3/5G9zJ1feW1jm734pqRzN7T4YNVuPUgbXJvUCiD34RAwaiH         Ue7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnU14ysHb5hCh48XG1BppLdtKwh2imXUoDfWYFXmOc1/XbkhSZ2T3+ChJoBJ449SBdPpxMG
X-Received: by 10.52.99.69 with SMTP id eo5mr10128823vdb.81.1430422425668; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:33:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.28.46 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpkE88bENod42T43KpToY0odiVWk8p=0bWYcu7ADyQM4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFULd4anFuykMh6ZmDhJ7QM_5enEpR=1p=S5n5gRgcHHpR1zmA@mail.gmail.com> <CABtf2+Q-fqDMUwCBY5WdoRYnyOh+MOB9G8HQh9+e3U_wHRjpoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4b9B5LD1khwkefwnLfarjJMMTayS=_uxaheiXPhjGj3CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4Y4KnrkzuSKxsdkmHuMmZ-qzQvjR80BB44AP-SEiq=RLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABtf2+Rnjp7f+wHUpn_E2dti-CkYTMk28puyH-EL1=5ep-brKA@mail.gmail.com> <CABtf2+TqLWgJr5od3pETcV3W7ZQ7-sm9zQXjVc6z0MBhGwGuZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4YbMsxuOQko2jy7LdxiL0Ob=fR5v4qCXOEM80iPHE=1cA@mail.gmail.com> <CABtf2+TGMehxiZDSXXCbX76AWYk5oXy-UdEUwEqWPXr2uYg51w@mail.gmail.com> <554268AB.9060009@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOpkE88bENod42T43KpToY0odiVWk8p=0bWYcu7ADyQM4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Caroline Tice <cmtice@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:34:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CABtf2+Q88YOgp2rMxBJKUMWdH30BO323LeQAty-bFPa+P5SB5g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix size & type for cold partition names (hot-cold function partitioning)
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, 	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg02088.txt.bz2

What is the correct way to regenerate doc/tm.texi?

-- Caroline

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:24 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 04/30/2015 09:26 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
>>> 2015-04-30  Caroline Tice  <cmtice@google.com>
>>>
>>>  PR 65929
>>> * config/elfos.h (ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_NAME): New macro definition.
>>> (ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_SIZE): New macro definition.
>>> * doc/tm.texi.in (ASM_DECLARE_COLD_FUNCTION_NAME): Document new macro.
>
> This breaks bootstrap.  You also need to regenerate and
> check in doc/tm.texi.
>
> --
> H.J.