From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335735-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1782 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 19:32:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 1769 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2013 19:32:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:32:44 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l6so2939006vcl.31        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:32:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.52.98.73 with SMTP id eg9mr9517682vdb.18.1358537564034; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:32:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.215.38 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:32:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20130117235952.GX7269@tucnak.redhat.com>
References: <CABu31nOXZ7=j11mwxFWUXotLL7+XqaGM4TK0v9YRQhZ0k7Q45A@mail.gmail.com> <20130117235952.GX7269@tucnak.redhat.com>
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CABu31nOSJYpBsNBm-OVe22uqJSvrTBPFOdJtGiF_2=DeYH-=Xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] PR inline-asm/55934
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00978.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:45:06AM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> --- testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55934.c (revision 0)
>> +++ testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55934.c (revision 0)
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +/* PR inline-asm/55934 */
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sse } */
>
> Don't you need /* { dg-options "-msse" } */ ?  dg-require-effective-target sse
> itself doesn't add -msse option...

Actually, I needed even more than that:

/* { dg-options "-std=c99 -msse" } */

But I added that line after creating the diff, and forgot to update
the test case in the patch :-)

Ciao!
Steven