From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-336054-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17095 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2013 22:27:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 17086 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2013 22:27:14 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ve0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ve0-f180.google.com) (209.85.128.180)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:26:51 +0000
Received: by mail-ve0-f180.google.com with SMTP id jx10so114082veb.25        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.52.21.13 with SMTP id r13mr11406157vde.37.1359325610317; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.215.38 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:26:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5105A5B0.4080705@gjlay.de>
References: <5102D1CD.4020509@gjlay.de> <5102E221.60605@redhat.com> <5102EFE0.1070605@gjlay.de> <5105A5B0.4080705@gjlay.de>
From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 22:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CABu31nPx_+ayNpfYx=Yba1Gj4HWEQ+ZMc_YKupnYFZaOYN+h=A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix PR54814
To: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@gjlay.de>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, 	Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>, 	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg01297.txt.bz2

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>>>> The patch was originally worked out by Bernd Schmidt and fixed a problem
>>>> introduced in
>>>>
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/r190252

Ironically, this revision fixes a reload problem on x86/x86_64 --
which doesn't use reload anymore now...


> Does this mean the fix is rejected for 4.8?

No, just that it probably helps to add a RM to the CC list.

FWIW, it seems to me that this patch should go into 4.8, because the
bug is probably not limited to AVR.

Ciao!
Steven