From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 37578 invoked by alias); 29 May 2015 08:22:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 37564 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2015 08:22:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-la0-f45.google.com Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f45.google.com) (209.85.215.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 29 May 2015 08:21:59 +0000 Received: by lagv1 with SMTP id v1so50116234lag.3 for ; Fri, 29 May 2015 01:21:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.184.101 with SMTP id et5mr6803959lac.43.1432887715141; Fri, 29 May 2015 01:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.90.230 with HTTP; Fri, 29 May 2015 01:21:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7B4175B2-2FAA-4A96-943B-06B379D03C75@gmail.com> <4420E8FB-D61F-4F61-8A86-6ADE01B235E9@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 08:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, testsuite]: Cleanup dumps From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer To: Mike Stump Cc: Uros Bizjak , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg02728.txt.bz2 On 31 January 2015 at 22:10, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On January 31, 2015 9:17:57 PM GMT+01:00, Mike Stump wrote: >>On Jan 31, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >> wrote: >>> On January 31, 2015 10:53:39 AM GMT+01:00, Uros Bizjak >> wrote: >>>> Hello! >>> >>> Reminds me of just auto-wiping dump files: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02506.html >> >>> Mike, WDYT? >> >>Ok. >> >>My only concern of speed isn=E2=80=99t founded, as you stated it was fast= er to >>scan the flags. >> >>I think I=E2=80=99m fine with it going in now, but, if you do, you have to >>watch for and resolve any fallout. Watch for RM comments, I=E2=80=99d de= fer to >>them on timing. >> >>If you want to wait until stage 1, that=E2=80=99s fine too. > > I'd only want that to go in in stage 1. I have applied this now as r223858. Please CC me on fallout. Thanks,