From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Optimize std::to_array for trivial types [PR110167]
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 15:37:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4=15b3KFXsBZZLhc7d4VoRSFEqQdP3Q04PGAr9sVZ5y=Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4=-kO_P1L62PALbKCFOrWZM_kCPJ8LLdwUVTGtJs+NUKw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6866 bytes --]
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 09:29, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 01:54, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
>>
>> > Tested powerpc64le-linux. Pushed to trunk.
>> >
>> > This makes sense to backport after some soak time on trunk.
>> >
>> > -- >8 --
>> >
>> > As reported in PR libstdc++/110167, std::to_array compiles extremely
>> > slowly for very large arrays. It needs to instantiate a very large
>> > specialization of std::index_sequence<N...> and then create a very large
>> > aggregate initializer from the pack expansion. For trivial types we can
>> > simply default-initialize the std::array and then use memcpy to copy the
>> > values. For non-trivial types we need to use the existing
>> > implementation, despite the compilation cost.
>> >
>> > As also noted in the PR, using a generic lambda instead of the
>> > __to_array helper compiles faster since gcc-13. It also produces
>> > slightly smaller code at -O1, due to additional inlining. The code at
>> > -Os, -O2 and -O3 seems to be the same. This new implementation requires
>> > __cpp_generic_lambdas >= 201707L (i.e. P0428R2) but that is supported
>> > since Clang 10 and since Intel icc 2021.5.0 (and since GCC 10.1).
>> >
>> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> > PR libstdc++/110167
>> > * include/std/array (to_array): Initialize arrays of trivial
>> > types using memcpy. For non-trivial types, use lambda
>> > expressions instead of a separate helper function.
>> > (__to_array): Remove.
>> > * testsuite/23_containers/array/creation/110167.cc: New test.
>> > ---
>> > libstdc++-v3/include/std/array | 53 +++++++++++++------
>> > .../23_containers/array/creation/110167.cc | 14 +++++
>> > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>> > create mode 100644
>> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/array/creation/110167.cc
>> >
>> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
>> b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
>> > index 70280c1beeb..b791d86ddb2 100644
>> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
>> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
>> > @@ -414,19 +414,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> > return std::move(std::get<_Int>(__arr));
>> > }
>> >
>> > -#if __cplusplus > 201703L
>> > +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L && __cpp_generic_lambdas >= 201707L
>> > #define __cpp_lib_to_array 201907L
>> > -
>> > - template<bool _Move = false, typename _Tp, size_t... _Idx>
>> > - constexpr array<remove_cv_t<_Tp>, sizeof...(_Idx)>
>> > - __to_array(_Tp (&__a)[sizeof...(_Idx)], index_sequence<_Idx...>)
>> > - {
>> > - if constexpr (_Move)
>> > - return {{std::move(__a[_Idx])...}};
>> > - else
>> > - return {{__a[_Idx]...}};
>> > - }
>> > -
>> > template<typename _Tp, size_t _Nm>
>> > [[nodiscard]]
>> > constexpr array<remove_cv_t<_Tp>, _Nm>
>> > @@ -436,8 +425,24 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> > static_assert(!is_array_v<_Tp>);
>> > static_assert(is_constructible_v<_Tp, _Tp&>);
>> > if constexpr (is_constructible_v<_Tp, _Tp&>)
>> > - return __to_array(__a, make_index_sequence<_Nm>{});
>> > - __builtin_unreachable(); // FIXME: see PR c++/91388
>> > + {
>> > + if constexpr (is_trivial_v<_Tp> && _Nm != 0)
>>
>> redundant _Nm != 0 test?
>>
>
> Ah yes, I added it below to ensure we don't use memcpy with a null
> __arr.data() and forgot to remove it here.
>
>
>>
>> > + {
>> > + array<remove_cv_t<_Tp>, _Nm> __arr;
>> > + if (!__is_constant_evaluated() && _Nm != 0)
>> > + __builtin_memcpy(__arr.data(), __a, sizeof(__a));
>> > + else
>> > + for (size_t __i = 0; __i < _Nm; ++__i)
>> > + __arr._M_elems[__i] = __a[__i];
>> > + return __arr;
>> > + }
>> > + else
>> > + return [&__a]<size_t... _Idx>(index_sequence<_Idx...>) {
>> > + return array<remove_cv_t<_Tp>, _Nm>{{ __a[_Idx]... }};
>> > + }(make_index_sequence<_Nm>{});
>> > + }
>> > + else
>> > + __builtin_unreachable(); // FIXME: see PR c++/91388
>> > }
>> >
>> > template<typename _Tp, size_t _Nm>
>> > @@ -449,8 +454,24 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> > static_assert(!is_array_v<_Tp>);
>> > static_assert(is_move_constructible_v<_Tp>);
>> > if constexpr (is_move_constructible_v<_Tp>)
>> > - return __to_array<1>(__a, make_index_sequence<_Nm>{});
>> > - __builtin_unreachable(); // FIXME: see PR c++/91388
>> > + {
>> > + if constexpr (is_trivial_v<_Tp>)
>> > + {
>> > + array<remove_cv_t<_Tp>, _Nm> __arr;
>> > + if (!__is_constant_evaluated() && _Nm != 0)
>> > + __builtin_memcpy(__arr.data(), __a, sizeof(__a));
>> > + else
>> > + for (size_t __i = 0; __i < _Nm; ++__i)
>> > + __arr._M_elems[__i] = std::move(__a[__i]);
>>
>> IIUC this std::move is unnecessary for trivial arrays?
>>
>
> Good point, thanks.
>
> That makes the lvalue and rvalue overloads identical for trivial types. It
> seems a shame to duplicate the code, so the rvalue one could do:
>
> if constexpr (is_trivial_v<_Tp>)
> return std::to_array<_Tp, _Num>(__a);
> else
>
> But that would imply an extra function call at -O0, and repeating overload
> resolution. Since the duplicated code is just a single function call to
> memcpy, this probably isn't an improvement.
>
> I'll test and push this:
>
Pushed as r14-1995-gb4f1e4a6443802, thanks for the review.
> libstdc++: Remove redundant code in std::to_array
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/array (to_array(T(&)[N])): Remove redundant
> condition.
> (to_array(T(&&)[N])): Remove redundant std::move.
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
> index b791d86ddb2..ad36cdad6d2 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/array
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> static_assert(is_constructible_v<_Tp, _Tp&>);
> if constexpr (is_constructible_v<_Tp, _Tp&>)
> {
> - if constexpr (is_trivial_v<_Tp> && _Nm != 0)
> + if constexpr (is_trivial_v<_Tp>)
> {
> array<remove_cv_t<_Tp>, _Nm> __arr;
> if (!__is_constant_evaluated() && _Nm != 0)
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> __builtin_memcpy(__arr.data(), __a, sizeof(__a));
> else
> for (size_t __i = 0; __i < _Nm; ++__i)
> - __arr._M_elems[__i] = std::move(__a[__i]);
> + __arr._M_elems[__i] = __a[__i];
> return __arr;
> }
> else
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-20 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-09 12:09 Jonathan Wakely
2023-06-20 0:54 ` Patrick Palka
2023-06-20 8:29 ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-06-20 14:37 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACb0b4=15b3KFXsBZZLhc7d4VoRSFEqQdP3Q04PGAr9sVZ5y=Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).