public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@cs.washington.edu>
Cc: Ken Matsui <kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] c++, libstdc++: implement __is_pointer built-in trait
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 11:01:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4=gR8ahznNaqtL7BUs_ZE0tXFLMYKpd1VWLMf03htmvGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAML+3pVbyfnZxnzcXXBg937yz7kgjSdAK6ZJLrspy=WovSov=A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 06:51, Ken Matsui via Libstdc++
<libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the benchmark result for is_pointer:
>
> https://github.com/ken-matsui/gcc-benches/blob/main/is_pointer.md#sun-jul--9-103948-pm-pdt-2023
>
> Time: -62.1344%
> Peak Memory Usage: -52.4281%
> Total Memory Usage: -53.5889%

Wow!

Although maybe we could have improved our std::is_pointer_v anyway, like so:

template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v = false;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp*> = true;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* const> = true;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* volatile> = true;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* const volatile> = true;

I'm not sure why I didn't already do that.

Could you please benchmark that? And if it is better than the current
impl using is_pointer<_Tp>::value then we should do this in the
library:

#if __has_builtin(__is_pointer)
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v = __is_pointer(_Tp);
#else
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v = false;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp*> = true;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* const> = true;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* volatile> = true;
template <typename _Tp>
  inline constexpr bool is_pointer_v<_Tp* const volatile> = true;
#endif


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-12 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-10  5:23 [PATCH " Ken Matsui
2023-07-10  5:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __is_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-07-10  5:32   ` Daniel Krügler
2023-07-10  5:34     ` Ken Matsui
2023-07-10  5:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] c++, libstdc++: implement __is_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-07-10  5:38   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] libstdc++: use new built-in trait __is_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-07-10  5:50   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] c++, libstdc++: implement __is_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-07-12 10:01     ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2023-07-12 20:42       ` Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  1:11         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] c++, libstdc++: Implement " Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  1:11           ` [PATCH v3 2/2] libstdc++: Use new built-in trait __is_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  1:13           ` [PATCH v3 1/2] c++, libstdc++: Implement __is_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  1:15             ` Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  3:16           ` [PATCH v4 " Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  3:16             ` [PATCH v4 2/2] libstdc++: Use new built-in trait __is_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  3:19             ` [PATCH v5 1/2] c++, libstdc++: Implement __is_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  3:19               ` [PATCH v5 2/2] libstdc++: Use new built-in trait __is_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-07-13 20:48                 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] c++, libstdc++: Implement __is_pointer built-in trait Ken Matsui
2023-07-13 20:48                   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] libstdc++: Use new built-in trait __is_pointer Ken Matsui
2023-09-01 13:00                     ` [PING][PATCH " Ken Matsui
2023-07-13  9:21         ` [PATCH v2 1/2] c++, libstdc++: implement __is_pointer built-in trait Jonathan Wakely
2023-07-13 20:04           ` Ken Matsui
2023-07-14 10:48             ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-07-14 10:49               ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-07-14 19:55                 ` Ken Matsui
2023-07-12  4:40 ` [PATCH " François Dumont
2023-07-12  9:47   ` Jonathan Wakely
2023-07-12  9:48 ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACb0b4=gR8ahznNaqtL7BUs_ZE0tXFLMYKpd1VWLMf03htmvGg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kmatsui@cs.washington.edu \
    --cc=kmatsui@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).