From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable -Winvalid-memory-order for C++ [PR99612]
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 17:14:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4kN5D4mcCtk-F-WhGS+C7R1jkLWx5nBMEZkHa7nqpzEyg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efdaf72b-15b8-84b8-b174-fd4d25c7de31@gmail.com>
On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 at 16:49, Martin Sebor wrote:
> I don't anticipate this change to lead to the same fallout
> because it's unlikely for GCC to synthesize invalid memory
> orders out of thin air;
Agreed. I don't think we'll have the same kind of issues. 99% of uses
of memory orders just use the constants explicitly, passing them
directly to the std::atomic member functions (or something that calls
them).
>and b) because the current solution
> can only detect the problems in calls to atomic functions at
> -O0 that are declared with attribute always_inline. This
> includes member functions defined in the enclosing atomic
> class but not namespace-scope functions. To make
> the detection possible those would also have to be
> always_inline. If that's a change you'd like to see I can
> look into making it happen.
I think we can ignore the namespace-scope functions in <atomic>. Most people do.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-08 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 16:49 Martin Sebor
2021-12-08 17:14 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2021-12-08 18:12 ` Martin Sebor
2021-12-15 15:30 ` PING " Martin Sebor
2021-12-23 23:20 ` Jeff Law
2022-01-05 8:45 ` Martin Liška
2022-01-05 20:34 ` Martin Sebor
2022-01-27 23:47 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-01-27 23:48 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-01-28 0:59 ` Martin Sebor
2022-01-28 11:05 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACb0b4kN5D4mcCtk-F-WhGS+C7R1jkLWx5nBMEZkHa7nqpzEyg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=msebor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).