From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-329459-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29175 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2012 09:45:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 29162 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2012 09:45:30 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:45:25 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p1so227204vcq.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=nAcv/AFefBzVl5kKND/X5G8nIst7398PGWZuQIYJb8U=;        b=BQdSdghe9IG5VTTmUS9JMHYbjhU+2F4c+ABln0nzVqB7XOCAgqeaIwLrHlWurYW/yT         ZWDQSa5kGnq96dvICgHLTVy23X9MvjdGBxvIpg1GHzj2SyNJXtJdkRrsgQSlDOj1T8+e         S8uyQcElw5ixSJDRntUcUsjlKbwJz84ctTpPU5vPNhBtFSE1pH4HYPFmUcsVwHiHxTbA         5/app6MS9ZVLXMGlZTPcMLknKaYl+iUuYb2cYSmgx0t5LypCqf5MOy2q29WTKHt50l1L         UaHTvApfxS+AK7KfYFSQGPvQBa/KgrYWqmoYrvVIjb9Kf3fC0nqh9qpCzrNpq1KyNhW4         tLfg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.220.203 with SMTP id hz11mr753481vcb.50.1350639924397; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.114.232 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJA7tRZVY_VKDkGrJq_KvHFXvc6fKM9nKJL4qshY6HE=8=ichQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACgzC7DTzdC2LKxQd74bvieL-1n4=G8KVqLVFMkCTgGj+sWP6A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJA7tRZVY_VKDkGrJq_KvHFXvc6fKM9nKJL4qshY6HE=8=ichQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:29:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CACgzC7BT78aH2uij9H_3iO04MDMZHa6y=BJWRacUL+PosB3GAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM] Fix PR target/54892 - [4.7/4.8 Regression], ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2123
From: Zhenqiang Chen <zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org>
To: ramrad01@arm.com
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGQgQgqSdzlvBzb76NN3AeUMMvq3xYiGsLWSn2Do1HwLwoZUr1dv1yh4j8UgLO4oP5jejx
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg01786.txt.bz2

On 19 October 2012 14:53, Ramana Radhakrishnan
<ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Zhenqiang Chen
> <zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In function arm_expand_compare_and_swap, oldval is converted to SImode
>> when its "mode" is QImode/HImode. After "FALLTHRU" to "case SImode",
>> we should use "SImode", other than "mode" (which is QImode/HImode).
>> And INSN atomic_compare_and_swap<mode>_1 expects the operand in
>> SImode.
>>
>> No make check regression.
>>
>> Is it OK for 4.7 and trunk?
>
>  Makes sense , OK for both.
>

Thanks. Committed to 4.7 and trunk.

-Zhenqiang