From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12868 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2013 19:36:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 12810 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2013 19:36:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_BF X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f172.google.com) (209.85.214.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:35:52 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id tb18so9225804obb.3 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:35:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=KKleqD5dnR5A7j9AF2MjsMpx65C1+gmyXxf+pXQf7sU=; b=XvAFjcpCR5Ugjj3MIR1IuH9wLSYTKyb0JjrRoHUXDYfNlddkld2M4qDf6KfnWXksmU LO+XPxZ43TdTZ/VpgPgueQCn1ZdzG8JphoUKfZ6IsdrCi4F6+hRId9CYYHfcxzQM99gl N/CrkPn85uWODZUsSnMpzEHwfut06odeDFUS7gLpu8CbGmIHv5aBSoL448LVmGkq7RLv 2OappuslhgdOaVQvMrPRbV048KPq80HNb0leFwWFsjjmXUW3k+l9cXrTwDxJFyNCDjLR 0L/MWI0geWFNjWXHyJQzBpw9INiAmKdak/bweVupT4Ln1FV3CF9ze6OZXU2C4SG6NjVJ +88g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.192.3 with SMTP id hc3mr5382893obc.41.1361475352158; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.90.229 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:35:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512673EA.40102@gmail.com> References: <30737390.tlL1EbtGQR@laptop1.gw.ume.nu> <512673EA.40102@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LIBFFI] Re: Re: [PATCH] Add support for PaX enable kernels (MPROTECT) From: Anthony Green To: Dave Korn Cc: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org, GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmmmJqi5yochUJTuJV8KhjH6sBd+89+fS4a36bsbnBSAaLzqvgpui49AMSY4+moRTeSpOJY X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg01032.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > Gcc-patches: Assuming AG approves, can we commit this without waiting for an > upstream libffi release and doing a full merge? Currently GCC HEAD won't > build libffi (and hence libjava) without it. This patch looks fine, thanks. I don't plan to merge back into GCC for at least a week or two, so I think you should commit it to the GCC tree independently. This means that 3.0.12 is broken for Cygwin. Are you able to produce test results once you apply this change? I should probably issue a quick 3.0.13 if the results are decent. Thanks, AG > > 2013-02-21 Dave Korn > > * src/closures.c (is_emutramp_enabled [!FFI_MMAP_EXEC_EMUTRAMP_PAX]): > Move default definition outside enclosing #if scope. > > cheers, > DaveK > -- > (*) - Patch: http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2012/msg00269.html > - Thread: http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2012/threads.html#00247