public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: yanzhang.wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>,
	 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,  pan2.li <pan2.li@intel.com>,
	 yanzhang.wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>,
	 "Robin Dapp" <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>,
	 jeffreyalaw <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: convert the mulh with 0 to mov 0 to the reg.
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 14:20:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADCF5ED6EF041E6+202306211420442711392@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230621060842.189680-1-yanzhang.wang@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4810 bytes --]

Good catch!
vmulh.vx v24,v24,zero -> vmv.v.i v1,0
can eliminate use of v24 and reduce register pressure.
 
But I wonder why you pick only VI_QHS?

+  [(set (match_operand:VI_QHS 0 "register_operand")

SEW = 64 should always have such optimization.

Thanks.


juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: yanzhang.wang
Date: 2023-06-21 14:08
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; kito.cheng; pan2.li; yanzhang.wang
Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: convert the mulh with 0 to mov 0 to the reg.
From: Yanzhang Wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>
 
This patch will optimize the below mulh example,
 
vint32m1_t shortcut_for_riscv_vmulh_case_0(vint32m1_t v1, size_t vl) {
  return __riscv_vmulh_vx_i32m1(v1, 0, vl);
}
 
from mulh pattern
 
vsetvli   zero, a2, e32, m1, ta, ma
vmulh.vx  v24, v24, zero
vs1r.v    v24, 0(a0)
 
to below vmv.
 
vsetvli zero,a2,e32,m1,ta,ma
vmv.v.i v1,0
vs1r.v  v1,0(a0)
 
It will elimate the mul with const 0 instruction to the simple mov
instruction.
 
Signed-off-by: Yanzhang Wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>
 
gcc/ChangeLog:
 
* config/riscv/autovec-opt.md: Add a split pattern.
 
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
 
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-121.c: The mul
  with 0 will be simplified to vmv.v.i.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmulh-with-zero.cc: New test.
---
gcc/config/riscv/autovec-opt.md               | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
.../riscv/rvv/autovec/vmulh-with-zero.cc      | 19 ++++++++++++
.../riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-121.c  |  3 +-
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmulh-with-zero.cc
 
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/autovec-opt.md b/gcc/config/riscv/autovec-opt.md
index 28040805b23..9c14be964b5 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/autovec-opt.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/autovec-opt.md
@@ -405,3 +405,33 @@
   "vmv.x.s\t%0,%1"
   [(set_attr "type" "vimovvx")
    (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
+
+;; Simplify VMULH (V, 0) Instructions to vmv.v.i.
+(define_split
+  [(set (match_operand:VI_QHS 0 "register_operand")
+ (if_then_else:VI_QHS
+   (unspec:<VM>
+     [(match_operand:<VM> 1 "vector_all_trues_mask_operand")
+       (match_operand 5 "vector_length_operand")
+       (match_operand 6 "const_int_operand")
+       (match_operand 7 "const_int_operand")
+       (match_operand 8 "const_int_operand")
+       (reg:SI VL_REGNUM)
+       (reg:SI VTYPE_REGNUM)] UNSPEC_VPREDICATE)
+   (unspec:VI_QHS
+     [(vec_duplicate:VI_QHS
+        (match_operand:<VEL> 4 "reg_or_0_operand"))
+       (match_operand:VI_QHS 3 "register_operand")] VMULH)
+   (match_operand:VI_QHS 2 "vector_merge_operand")))]
+  "TARGET_VECTOR
+     && rtx_equal_p (operands[4], CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (operands[4])))"
+  [(const_int 0)]
+  {
+    machine_mode mask_mode = riscv_vector::get_mask_mode (<MODE>mode)
+      .require ();
+    emit_insn (gen_pred_mov (<MODE>mode, operands[0], CONST1_RTX (mask_mode),
+   RVV_VUNDEF (<MODE>mode), CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (operands[0])),
+   operands[5], operands[6], operands[7], operands[8]));
+    DONE;
+  }
+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmulh-with-zero.cc b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmulh-with-zero.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6e4a3d62bc0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vmulh-with-zero.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64 -O3 -Wno-psabi" } */
+
+#include "riscv_vector.h"
+
+#define VMULH_WITH_LMUL(X) \
+  vint32m##X##_t shortcut_for_riscv_vmulh_case_##X (vint32m##X##_t v1,\
+      size_t vl) {      \
+    return __riscv_vmulh_vx_i32m ##X (v1, 0, vl);                     \
+  }
+
+
+VMULH_WITH_LMUL (1)
+VMULH_WITH_LMUL (2)
+VMULH_WITH_LMUL (4)
+VMULH_WITH_LMUL (8)
+VMULH_WITH_LMUL (f2)
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmv\.v\.i\sv[0-9]+,0} 5} */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-121.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-121.c
index 4d2de91bc14..d1473274137 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-121.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/binop_vx_constraint-121.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ void f6 (void * in, void *out, int32_t x)
     __riscv_vse64_v_i64m1 (out, v3, 4);
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmulh\.vx\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,zero} 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmv\.v\.i\sv[0-9]+,0} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vmulh\.vx\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,zero} 1 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vdiv\.vx\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,zero} 2 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {vrem\.vx\s+v[0-9]+,\s*v[0-9]+,zero} 2 } } */
-- 
2.40.1
 
 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-21  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-21  6:08 yanzhang.wang
2023-06-21  6:20 ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-06-21  6:54   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-06-21  6:23 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-06-21  6:27 ` Robin Dapp
2023-06-21  6:33   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-06-21  7:08     ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-06-21  7:25       ` juzhe.zhong
2023-07-28 11:50 ` [PATCH v2] " yanzhang.wang
2023-07-28 12:00   ` Kito Cheng
2023-07-28 12:00   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-07-28 12:31     ` Robin Dapp
2023-07-28 23:07       ` Jeff Law
2023-07-31 12:14         ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-07-31 15:48           ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADCF5ED6EF041E6+202306211420442711392@rivai.ai \
    --to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=pan2.li@intel.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=yanzhang.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).