From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53825 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2015 16:46:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 53813 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2015 16:46:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-lb0-f171.google.com Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f171.google.com) (209.85.217.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:46:12 +0000 Received: by lbcga7 with SMTP id ga7so87708663lbc.1 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:46:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.44.225 with SMTP id h1mr5045580lam.5.1429289168967; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:46:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.163.129 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:45:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55312777.1090409@gjlay.de> References: <54F4BCA1.7080707@gjlay.de> <20150303132144.GC24277@atmel.com> <54FDC417.1000008@gjlay.de> <5523CEDE.1060204@gjlay.de> <55251030.1070305@gjlay.de> <55266135.20003@gjlay.de> <5531128C.3010709@gjlay.de> <55312777.1090409@gjlay.de> From: Denis Chertykov Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch,avr,installed] ad PR65296: Adjust specs to new avr-libc layout as of #44574 To: Georg-Johann Lay Cc: "Sivanupandi, Pitchumani" , GCC Patches , "Selvaraj, Senthil_Kumar" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00908.txt.bz2 2015-04-17 18:32 GMT+03:00 Georg-Johann Lay : > Am 04/17/2015 um 04:43 PM schrieb Denis Chertykov: >> >> 2015-04-17 17:02 GMT+03:00 Georg-Johann Lay : >>> >>> ...I went ahead and installed as >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/r222179 >>> >>> It will be backported to 5.2 as soon as 5.1 is open for patches again >>> (assuming RM won't approve this one for 5.1). >> >> >> IMHO AVR port is not locked for patches. >> It's not a primary target. > > > hmm, the usual text is that the complete branch is frozen: I asked this question a few years ago. The answe was that I can change the port in any time. Maybe something has changed.